From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A4A6138346 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 16:30:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C98DCE0A8E; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 16:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40C56E0A70 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 16:30:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux1.home (cpe-70-124-168-176.austin.res.rr.com [70.124.168.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 421D234DDBD for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2020 16:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 20909 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 05 Jan 2020 16:30:35 -0000 Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2020 10:30:35 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] call for agenda items for 2020-01-12 council meeting Message-ID: <20200105163035.GB20623@linux1.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20191229233030.GA23955@linux1.home> <96ee05ea-ef21-665e-fb6f-fa8519db89dc@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <96ee05ea-ef21-665e-fb6f-fa8519db89dc@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 8d9a2460-a0b4-403f-89a1-37086e6fb3e3 X-Archives-Hash: ab651079b18c268bd69a979f4921866a --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 05, 2020 at 03:55:22PM +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I'd like to request Council to define rules regarding maintainership > boundaries and provide guidance regarding under what conditions one is > allowed to make changes to packages that are by metadata.xml maintained > by another party. After seeing the emails on this thread and a brief chat on irc, I don't think this is actionable at this time. There should be more discussion and a concrete proposal should be brought to the ml. Thanks, William --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXhIPJgAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OEu6AKCQm3VagNXa46ZrPlqaO97YFosk7wCffBxH/00+DxaXBeVvBsdq1TkDcKc= =slYe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a--