From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28746138334 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E8D04E0877; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B95BDE0875 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from linux1.home (cpe-66-68-48-101.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.48.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7419A346407 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (nullmailer pid 14536 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:12:30 -0000 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:12:30 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Questions for Gentoo Council nominees: GLEP 76 Message-ID: <20190618141230.GA12939@linux1.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20190615124220.fcf0c08b22481d5bc6c2dbe0@gentoo.org> <20190615124933.b2f20fde0b47509e6b54f989@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190615124933.b2f20fde0b47509e6b54f989@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 770882e3-dc66-4a1d-9ef6-0d23d0907c73 X-Archives-Hash: 917de67a82513fbe6f8e32e9126e252c --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 12:49:33PM +0300, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > In my opinion GLEP 76 is the most controversial decision made by > running council. While it fixed some long standing issues like > copyright headers and proper acknowledgement of out of the tree > contributors, it created grave problems: now some long-time > contributors and even developer are seriously discriminated because > they want to keep their privacy. =20 I only know of one developer who this affected, so I don't see it as that big of an issue. Personally, I'm fine with the real name requirement for sign-offs;. The Linux kernel requires real names, and I believe many open source projects do. William --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCXQjxSQAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OCIKAKCRXlXbAW3IsSeVWKo0UNVoNM/DwgCePQPL9dov/stfeoLfd6CEbamq3+A= =vOge -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--