From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCA8C138334 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8C3AE09B5; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87839E09AD for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (219x123x27x194.ap219.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [219.123.27.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: alicef) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1FC6334081F; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 06:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 15:27:12 +0900 From: Alice Ferrazzi To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: Ulrich Mueller , Gokturk Yuksek Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items -- council meeting 2019-04-14 Message-ID: <20190410062712.jvgec4vhpvvo2e6v@gentoo.org> References: <4bbfc34f-335f-5521-310a-b66ffd0d9a9a@gentoo.org> <5e30d658-80c8-b608-1505-dc08db3625bf@gentoo.org> <20190403174315.32615d3b9574571e3ed4a399@gentoo.org> <80ed2e482e96c96555bf4fd9331731c4c9ad0d7f.camel@gentoo.org> <232747ba-063c-821f-a66d-5f106ed2aa82@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-Archives-Salt: 915fb16a-671e-4fe4-8bef-5797d96152df X-Archives-Hash: 8f83e555aaf0a0058380d35d6ac66c8d The 04/10/2019 07:59, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 09 Apr 2019, Gokturk Yuksek wrote: > > > I'd like to (informally) propose the following, for which I'm willing > > to formulate as a GLEP proposal if there is interest: > > > The Foundation has an established practice of storing the legal names > > of developers who join under a pseudonym. The infrastructure is > > already in place for this. I think that allowing these developers to > > commit using their pseudonyms as long as the Foundation is informed > > their real identity does not exacerbate the legal risks they already > > pose. The foundation may decide their arbitrary criteria on who is > > eligible for this type of protection, including requiring sound legal > > reasons for them to keep their identities hidden. I understand that > > the maintenance of this could be a burden for the Foundation in > > theory, but in practice I suspect this number is very low already. > > That doesn't work, because there would be no way for a person outside of > the Foundation to verify such identities. > There is no way also for foundation to check all sign-off are assigned to real legal names. > To clarify, I won't be opposed against making a specific exception and > "grandfathering" any devs who had commit access before the cut-off date > when GLEP 76 was implemented. > I propose foundation to vote for add the use of pseudonym in the GLEP 76. For keeping Gentoo a confortable and inclusive place. > However, going forward, we shouldn't allow any further exceptions from > the real name policy. > who said that we cannot allow any further excepions from the real name policy? -- ====================================== Thanks, Alice Ferrazzi Gentoo Kernel Project Leader PGP: 2E4E 0856 461C 0585 1336 F496 5621 A6B2 8638 781A ======================================