From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05EE9138334 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47631E097C; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-x32d.google.com (mail-ot1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3495E097B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id 32so13101417ota.12 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 09:47:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QoaUxxa3ytuqZXjNichZjPfi7PzY4u3/jnWlkuysq1s=; b=QNfSNcK6R4fOVUkqKfrOKm9ejfgw8rorgQccg75CBIL2sssE6fbciizHJ7Y7J0G6Tx MaLiizYe5ev0yeRdu3VNKDd+i78QEFEwyVMwsBIkEJfP5LIDjI7QEbemJnDFTyRHHA1/ joVV4HtvAzK0iAvRH8q1udIDqDXi7kFcDf+40uCw2tZ5WHhPfvFuzZjEVZBSOP1zqSFA 0BH5DkpjoWAlOpKrBbgbkqwJ0A1RGs7bebqEqmSBQA4XejdOjhB2PlMSQWgLq1aSw1at Iplmi5j3B9i0CI6v95r2YWOjeHLEFr6ML5najostfgTCXs9hv3uFcXWSbRMEoguhx1Y5 pNLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=QoaUxxa3ytuqZXjNichZjPfi7PzY4u3/jnWlkuysq1s=; b=OP5a73/Xdo21h+WNAoL/TfIj/wBW8tzVO+UNM9maZK5MJs3YCEXOC0ngADUkPFf5F7 7Ay0uV/IwVNyDeiB8jIAJOdMgDo9vO2h4jhkJdZaWeBCA4O1GEFUjNP6QC84Sx6UWtL6 7UPzbhRM0lcErPX93FgClGwK05MYywUP799rAUZBV2U5Ri1QGPZB8csd1ukjzs7hqxf0 0sY0fgkKWglsbSuW3eDH0t3cyQEMrWboNeTEOHgcm9c7eiZ0/RBTmy4O8XUjWshv4Rzu MS41CrhSftOI9WzDMk+sovYPCcM0wOANq1OfOhQI4b4hbDBpbOLxt630cf8rmqFqQHzK gRqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gI2FIM60Fthi0DF7NVrY/+40uA9unqp+Q/9f3bblKMiGg+71vxP FY5JIkfTGWTaxGy6FuygS8wx2Ztg X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WrcBQR/NvZbWBPHHNA9qQ+YCA6L7eQ+586uNDMGonsPTcKq01pNpE2b6p5HQFLCRI10WZRBQ== X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3a5:: with SMTP id f34mr11851230otf.208.1543081669902; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 09:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux1 (cpe-66-68-48-101.austin.res.rr.com. [66.68.48.101]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v37sm6355333ote.78.2018.11.24.09.47.48 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 09:47:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 13819 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 17:47:47 -0000 Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:47:47 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: copyright attribution clarifications Message-ID: <20181124174747.GA19308@linux1.home> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20181114024643.GA15537@linux1.home> <20181114174522.cab71989801dc2c155735326@gentoo.org> <20181114185302.875806d543d7da9d9162fc42@gentoo.org> <0ab206f1-4416-b35c-0f1b-85d5dd24c7c0@poindexter.ovh> <0082a107-c458-d9bd-0f38-9b3085f0a9d3@poindexter.ovh> <79c57d08-8b0b-ed86-33dd-30462ca1d72d@poindexter.ovh> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79c57d08-8b0b-ed86-33dd-30462ca1d72d@poindexter.ovh> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Archives-Salt: 86027b54-67ac-49cf-add6-d470837d1399 X-Archives-Hash: 66e25c74bb3a8b39a9d8e00de6a77992 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 03:40:01PM -0500, Sarah White wrote: > On 11/23/18 3:25 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > On 2018-11-23 3:23 p.m., Sarah White wrote: > >=20 > >> > >> Either way: multiline copyright notices are legally valid, > >> or is that meant to be disputed? I'm not clear on the > >> intent for this comment: > >> > >> ["...don't have to be listed in a notice"] > >> > >=20 > > legal validity !=3D legal requirement > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Sure. You're not wrong. >=20 > You've left out the other section which starts: >=20 > ["The interest in removing or discouraging..."] >=20 > What's the purpose of removing or discouraging > something which doesn't harm gentoo, but rather, > helps get more support from: ["contributors who > are in a situation where a contract may require a > copyright notice for anything done on-the-clock"] >=20 > ... and/or other harmless reasons. >=20 > The intent / reasoning for removal or prohibition > of a multiline copyright notice has tenuous footing, > and worries me that nobody in this thread has made > a stronger argument than: ["we're not required by any > law to allow a different copyright notice, so we'll > require it to be a gentoo authors copyright notice."] This is what concerns me as well. All of the folks in this thread who want to forbid multiline copyright notices have yet to convince me that there is a technical argument for doing so. If there is one, I'm willing to be convinced, but that's not what I'm hearing. For example, If there are really performance reasons, let's see the benchma= rks proving it. William --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCW/mOvwAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OL4YAJsEPM5HeBw1wMwvP8upSm15dp5fSwCgttvIczPIbKjue01uQrRoDVwZdA4= =oC4x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx--