On 18-11-02 16:05:35, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> The Undertakers team has frequently received various forms of
> 'criticism' of their effort in attempting to find and retire inactive
> developers.  This is getting as far as to claim that we shouldn't retire
> anyone because there are no limits on commit slots.
> 
> Therefore, I would like to ask the wider community a general question:
> how do you feel about preserving commit access for people who no longer
> actively commit to Gentoo?  I'm talking about extreme cases, say,
> no commits to any user-visible repository for over a year.
> 

I'm not sure the exact time, but I think it shouldn't be user-visable,
but 'Gentoo' that should ben what's looked at.

As far as changing the developer to a non-committing developer, what
happens if they want to come back?  Would they need to retake the quiz,
re-find a mentor/recruiter, etc?

-- 
Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)