From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EE05138334 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:24:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4144BE096F; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (dev.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F41B9E096E for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [185.31.167.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bircoph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D476335D04 for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2018 21:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:24:07 +0300 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2018-10-14 Message-Id: <20181012002407.cdc9701a0dbcabef36edff56@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20180930140524.015249f0@sf> <20181011153139.7700484dc6c452ed570df66a@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Fri__12_Oct_2018_00_24_07_+0300_IYg1BWvaX_zSsp_5" X-Archives-Salt: a7cdf67c-c3cd-46a8-82cb-f4910624141f X-Archives-Hash: 7e5cc64f4e5a8e862d9ca2fb92be70ca --Signature=_Fri__12_Oct_2018_00_24_07_+0300_IYg1BWvaX_zSsp_5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:35:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018, Alec Warner wrote: >=20 > > My reading of ulm's proposal is that it is allowed. >=20 > > Ebuilds "shall" use the simple attribution, not that they "must" use it. >=20 > > To me that implies the simple attribution should be the default, but the > > complex attribution is acceptable in the ::gentoo repo. >=20 > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding the proposal? >=20 > No, you've understood it exactly how it was meant. Then please write this explicitly in the proposed change. Right now it is only "shall" vs "must" difference which may confuse people and create misunderstanding in future. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Fri__12_Oct_2018_00_24_07_+0300_IYg1BWvaX_zSsp_5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE63ZIHsdeM+1XgNer9lNaM7oe5I0FAlu/v3cACgkQ9lNaM7oe 5I18EQ/+JZLdOBm0ydaAVSGLO2xZM9kL2CeKUuV0w/X9u+XlXRK1vPFUL7GzXUSR K9983eQ/xgU0AT2XNhnJ69KIBbtRDYYrZKqJzMkdV0CI1J2cjerQjfq+IvP3k97k 0yW8YivBiYEqUxotAv42r2elt7W8/oNcoVTtDJEtFsNKUF2DN6tU9P0v3agXVRI8 ImFfGDBpSG7czEsI3czHnqDsxtLc7nCyRXRW3RVypvwL1uaBLl9G27T7TPI/qAk9 xSjFeYukJ0W3YdzcmILkN7MP56H5cQavoFENrsmfC14QGiDDst2N4Ovm5zUlylnD V+kTgLe6m8rgmX0uojGtWobQqCe1qIK9JnUwDPhphmWkXvmWZc+3NbeXmy8D0qm6 2W0JoKgnhXstSF0SxCLeA1AhrfP0oMOX2//7bJYi/hxwlOlugRuwpi3FSgws6hsE upI1TV6x4wD8DD5hRyL0FrHI1hVYHUSGuTtsNr+DlXyDOCrdmShscOAdW2DmxRGU LNCepYNWmxrEpArTc6nPvUD6qpSteFpUuN/xNsDe96jv7vzFzo9Fwv9U4zKTYZ23 A7BVm12MdRStYt4jdNBc5n79oPUkLqE2tC9URuSoAoxhz2FYaAf05FL/iP6f5Pta Ooe2HztMhhO2eYK55BPDTz4z+p1FwLb/OOhX0IuR/uBijIF3LsM= =9qnK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Fri__12_Oct_2018_00_24_07_+0300_IYg1BWvaX_zSsp_5--