From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7521F1382C5 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 70418E08F4; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C9BCE08ED for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e34:eeaa:6bd0:4ecc:6aff:fe03:1cfc]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: aballier) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 31899335C0A for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2018 13:02:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2018 15:02:20 +0200 From: Alexis Ballier To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Meeting agenda - Council meeting 2018-04-08 Message-ID: <20180407150220.03331a8b@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <871sfxkqo1.fsf@gentoo.org> <87lge4xw93.fsf@gentoo.org> <20180406021508.GA4824@linux1.home> <20180406023938.exac37p7gaccynll@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.16.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f55f1b92-7b68-4a2c-a9c8-2c90b99ebf1c X-Archives-Hash: 0148c5e1f26a76eb3bc801313dea2151 On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:44:47 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:46 PM, David Abbott > wrote: > > > > So the funding is coming from the council? What will SPI use to pay > > infra with? > > Presumably it would work similarly to the current state - we'd > encourage people to donate via whatever organization we want the most > money flowing into at the time. If we need more money in the > Foundation bank account, we'd point donors to the Foundation. If we > needed more money in some other bank account, we'd point donors to > that one instead. Wow. So, presumably, we'd be showing a great lack of professionalism to potential donors by our inability to solve ridiculous internal disputes and asking them to pick sides. Budgeting and delegating management of it is what usually allows to maintain each sub-entity bank account (or virtual bank account) on tracks, but the requirement for this to work is to be able to agree in the first place...