From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 330CC1382C5 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 51686E0AA0; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FDD8E0A9F for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id e20so19154916qkm.7 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:55:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iToRk7OUNFqMMQ0fTBazbMOtxbfhvOibKIIqZEWZqUE=; b=HIXJ8tbyqp++wXmwwC0Qy4U69cSzhe1VKVDq4m1mQFQGJfMiYx2n875YY97FLHJ5Gm /BNFLgD11X/lZ9TFwHy20XQANZ9yd973W7ZFdIwNbH0bptTJSiCBzfImXhGg27h31cjz M3MGp/Svjos1OGtCqL1I7aNktlkMRfs1nltDtctdFimTkdIpfviwcAmPPUa9q3UbUOu5 atSq5lRaUXG5LGfHg8ia6vzWrgHe9D8ilaxe+EPklhkXWAK2MIf2+kvHCWYYzdJn/Qzg IvwvjasEJ882D0de2S3JQH91/TzP58ZRMM3SFs/fRuA5t3HjkAPx0hW1lIy28tX3C2bc S9og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=iToRk7OUNFqMMQ0fTBazbMOtxbfhvOibKIIqZEWZqUE=; b=ilIzUGuDwLQ4nbtbHNJHAs00x/5xTfFe+I9nX8KRUlqX5EuhGDrUCaICIKi5EktukI Ind4Kz6NLJEtpQvmMJ62Mavn4jS8yyDT4Gf0qRDtrHyzlU7yFXbY3Dd2J0cjO3NaM8pR lI+3PZN60ZRGKLFfpytCTQMqnRRrQdsU9lsalZW0+dOKwY6hvHh1PwKvldbB8HanZ4qj 0rj/bMcVqD5OcF05ETqvwQMMKrZpLPcyzWYDjLwxhoRKwYdae7AelZhsjAUDtfuIXF9N ts2LMbOpVhpULtl2NkOa/oF2ukoIWnPnhx1SzFH00Bl1nYFw9UPWI9Mc9/UX4AsN28W0 NvPA== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPBvE5IgZq0UNdMw4o6lSjChklco8fhA+jNXgXIMUACdJD/+OlIp w/8EIMHHAerlVQhNeL+djZTTuQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x226VF1/5527IKQKKGINjNJyVri5nKWTDof2sNdsUpejmS9qOaoM7UcBmsf8WKn4iBt9oQjwZnA== X-Received: by 10.233.223.5 with SMTP id t5mr6036707qkf.326.1518454512888; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from whubbs1.gaikai.biz ([100.42.103.5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm1827675qkb.9.2018.02.12.08.55.10 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:55:11 -0800 (PST) Sender: William Hubbs Received: (nullmailer pid 23262 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:55:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:55:06 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals Message-ID: <20180212165506.GA23201@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20180211224234.GB6747@linux1.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-Archives-Salt: d8b0371b-e7f4-4924-9d72-33df0c62b41f X-Archives-Hash: d814e3a9093b68db9752df851135cdbb --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Daniel, On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 08:53:24AM -0700, Daniel Robbins wrote: > How about if they just abstain from any votes where there may be a conflict > of interest? I would hate to limit the ability of people to contribute > technically just because they were elected to council. The confusing thing about this is, how would we define "conflict of interest"? Suppose that the council decides to accept an appeal from comrel. Is it a conflict of interest for a member of the council who is also a member of comrel to vote in the appeal? If it isn't, it is at least a pretty strong perception that it is. William --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQTVeuxEZo4uUHOkQAluVBb0MMRlOAUCWoHG0gAKCRBuVBb0MMRl OAVsAJ46+5dqQxJdPLqeaj4BmCk8fybWQwCfZ0uytnD6jdo2TWG6cCeq0ydWxkA= =59Fy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LZvS9be/3tNcYl/X--