From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52ACC1382C5 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4F09DE09CE; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:10:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CCA7E09CB for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:e1cc:3::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: prometheanfire) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC215335C30 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 16:10:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 10:10:07 -0600 From: Matthew Thode To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals Message-ID: <20180212161007.7tvzhwovrkmdzrmz@gentoo.org> References: <20180211224234.GB6747@linux1.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zdnqekhyug3efu55" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-Archives-Salt: f7a285cc-30cd-4c7a-a0a0-8b37e8f5f89a X-Archives-Hash: 1c144347e80a0d7277c7d66723cc5f55 --zdnqekhyug3efu55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18-02-12 08:53:24, Daniel Robbins wrote: > How about if they just abstain from any votes where there may be a confli= ct > of interest? I would hate to limit the ability of people to contribute > technically just because they were elected to council. >=20 > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 3:42 PM, William Hubbs wrot= e: >=20 > > Hi all, > > > > The council can't make this change since it is a glep 39 change, so I am > > bringing it to the community for discussion -- I assume there would need > > to be a full dev vote to make it happen. > > > > I feel that council members should not be members of projects whose > > actions can be appealed to the council like qa or comrel. I have felt > > this way for a long time, because I think it compromises the full > > council's ability to vote fairly on appeals. > > > > As a member of the council who would be affected by this, if it passes > > and I run and am elected to council again, I would have no problem with > > stepping down from QA. > > > > Attached is a patch for glep 39 which will make this change. > > > > Thoughts? > > I've thought a similiar thing, if we go this route we also need to ensure that a managed group does not obtain over 50% of the council seats as that mean they can't vote if they all obstain. --=20 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) --zdnqekhyug3efu55 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEExFR3cOKGRpGbcMHPZKN76q4ZpOgFAlqBvF4ACgkQZKN76q4Z pOhAQw/+KoQu689JY9gn4JNCPU2UMkhWw3YeCob7F/NW74nYEOYP4RJ/mUO3Ih96 itRpWpkdHHhZBIX+eIaSZJnIKMkUrda6bZj0Mw0KCU+HO0XBSQn2eG2YBp7E0l9Y uVQU3E4DwZWx2Ke5X5ju3AUKLOvh3vMGJGDE/xmnHiqE67b96GEx0/rv/aVheGXN /hv78rfEMN5atIKAOc+cCz9T6rPnC+rjverAveJwpxw127nneKXs7dGmMTCy2MHR Zugwu5zm2J2mspxgXU1EyoCiOwF7qk3diisJE73rF5elA4pZaGbEJena3bpg2+x6 hzHBE51jbFU9qcsubTROoOLBJ14M658f98+BDMJgxbbloZ/PFEUWU9CWfz9r2Nl7 QZ2MMkNpiO3hvw/VDWVxl79J+8GuB8J/lbS3gAJkztGQXg2nnv5h0dNns1zZCUyC 0aR4ST+y6qa6lgCmyx7IjWZZ2zk5n5+5NhGH6JEDxSx7qV2VGFqX6S3peJS2tc+/ EqDmHsasMOXkeB4KgQCdXUNvtmONqww8egdJSWOBr6XpHdsYopycj1+Sg9F/UlSr rJj37O8gAms7gjwX6mJwBIYrRKgPTNApAayKyIMS37vZiX449G/86oFAVaCS+Tua HdjCUAkO78g9WW19nW3pz2Gl53zfJzYh8fClFGtuBz1yEnZIUdA= =fZ8f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zdnqekhyug3efu55--