From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB0451382C5 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A329BE0D69; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (mail.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759CCE0D2B for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:19:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org (khnum.cheops.bitzolder.nl [80.101.160.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: grobian) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2778335C31 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2018 08:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2018 09:19:29 +0100 From: Fabian Groffen To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] rfc: council members and appeals Message-ID: <20180212081929.GB13112@gentoo.org> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20180211224234.GB6747@linux1.home> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180211224234.GB6747@linux1.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (SunOS 5.11, VIM - Vi IMproved 8.0) Organization: Gentoo Foundation, Inc. X-Archives-Salt: d29961b7-c4bb-4d82-9784-6474366e2701 X-Archives-Hash: 1174783c9f8a5695d021cb779dfea732 --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11-02-2018 16:42:34 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > I feel that council members should not be members of projects whose > actions can be appealed to the council like qa or comrel. I have felt > this way for a long time, because I think it compromises the full > council's ability to vote fairly on appeals. I agree with this feeling. Thanks, Fabian --=20 Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EABEKAB0WIQSDHIpHdkhfn9Ptmh5fdfYHxcdOiQUCWoFOEQAKCRBfdfYHxcdO iXKRAJ9nzNdHaSC0J08y5gopM+stA7/MhACfa7sLVDv6h5Kq+OFs/8yU6zLuPKk= =8tBS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--