From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D349139694 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 363EE1FC003; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09C631FC002 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 715BA3417A8 for ; Tue, 18 Jul 2017 21:23:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:23:17 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] The problem of defunct and undermanned projects in Gentoo Message-ID: <20170719092317.7ba9beee@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <1500239562.11529.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20170719075622.293bff90@katipo2.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/ZRC7SIt5tssod+xn9.N1wIg"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: ebde5c81-55fa-43fd-83f9-766f3abfa857 X-Archives-Hash: 8969690467fca0cedc460a5e9b0c29cd --Sig_/ZRC7SIt5tssod+xn9.N1wIg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 18 Jul 2017 22:12:45 +0100 "M. J. Everitt" wrote: > I think mgorny was doing some general commit stats, and I have yet to > compile my own, but it would be very interesting to see how many > 'active' team members there were in any given project. I suspect the > results could be very telling ... Its not even like they're "inactive", they're just not active *in the team*. For some, there's no reason for them to devaway:=20 - They're on IRC - They commit daily But they're on teams they seldom do things in. This is probably more true the more teams you're on. --Sig_/ZRC7SIt5tssod+xn9.N1wIg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAllufFEACgkQ6FQySxNm qCAKEw//cB1OzDoy5I3+mzZ7ZjH/0xPK0yJ1HKkl4Mn3vdIaSXU/bIcndBMr+4pZ DckkxC0bU38692HabbPiZsPnX/il627KAvUZScXwVocn6MIaj1BMDOfI5ebpxFfa eQIY2psV/J1lcXO24Eb88KdxaFs7sl/OeInUIeMxjwwcs9gbDytA4PX1QXvoeN7F QzEfa7PMrFEc6WaLZrmqoru6Ohnp6J69YO5NIlkztcLWlmJr5Y4SRw/QrpcFC5tq wNFHUxZACgg4NuhkgYuxI9kwf2HqOdU1KN5bFLkpVpSwTgVntIHVIY0iH71sLPRk ska5MWohu232IHJt/WFV/HCjM++WhLJ6HM9yBwqCVghyzfkOShKHwK+pr6sEbUxn OFKmBfzJ7vb2tZQtg8sZGn8S6ESHPo3NNkjx+hF1GRZbNQRFfd4iwLRmrumuicUD vWx1q0JPCOqhE0IdS1a+503Vm+reUyK/GCnSISou/XeadTQwIWayHwqGTKsrF4VH KBa3024GuYVsVFvFOpaV3bDxbS55/3P5uIcbG27pJuHCO1R0VIUdwQCgUNvm+yEW XHC+EUKU/ogGa3Ll7WnA/2Wn/Ml4xqP05WDbf0JgifSEAmBnX89h0kGAG0i3CeIZ d5SDuxUTF8Gfrb1IBRSyeACqbDPdZMYgqOxCsx2+f2BE1ZdepeA= =dwGr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ZRC7SIt5tssod+xn9.N1wIg--