On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 23:12:42 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > What do you think? Would you mind getting that amount of mail once? > Any other ideas? From the mail I got, ( which I didn't mind ), I felt there was one distinguisher that was missing: "active" vs "passive" membership. Like, I get the impression ( with perl for instance ) that although many of its members are "around", and they occasionally "do something", I'm not sure they can all count as "There" in terms of staff-power metrics. If you make one commit every 6 months, are you really still "active"? Its useful to keep them all on the list, because they're people who have knowledge and can do the work if it comes there way, so I don't think *removing* them is the right thing to do. But for keeping tabs on "do we need more staff or not", it just serves as a confusing source of data.