From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55CD8139694 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2216BE0BEC; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (woodpecker.gentoo.org [IPv6:2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2260E0BE9 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from katipo2.lan (unknown [203.86.205.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kentnl) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C5D73416FA for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 09:14:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 21:14:04 +1200 From: Kent Fredric To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Items for Council Agenda, May 14 Message-ID: <20170513211404.408810bb@katipo2.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <0ac908a7-9875-f629-fa0c-0c85945e1185@gentoo.org> <871srvx3o8.fsf@kestrel.kyomu.43-1.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/ACTKESnmfMvUQapsp607gBQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 058d8014-08a3-4557-b862-554db8958715 X-Archives-Hash: 0bbd4e0ccd5c08a67efcf89565fb3b4e --Sig_/ACTKESnmfMvUQapsp607gBQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 11 May 2017 12:09:00 -0700 Raymond Jennings wrote: > I move that we table the actual discussion for the actual meeting. I > think at this point we're just gathering topics FOR discussion? This is one of those cases where "what the people collectively want" is important, so the people have to make their voices heard and effectively make their cases for the members of the council, and then the members of the council are suggested to factor in their own opinions in conjunction with the general demand the users indicated they wanted, in some retrospect. --Sig_/ACTKESnmfMvUQapsp607gBQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEPZazbI/qrFT1o9rn6FQySxNmqCAFAlkWzmgACgkQ6FQySxNm qCCu9g/8Cue7tdi/tMo3DIZRipPCjAgpljDRgMg9CPJFJ5Ne69zv4YPzu9s2FNMN jnOToFQ2RhYa/e7o2TMKVOlVwUlIMriCIauwPy57o23O7emI+znqbiMe0PETM38y 9l2AaVTGM5mp+EBvRAbqPVA8Y54AAOpg6zPRi58K0y7Tn79W5uCD0hQubCJ+YHhx tMMczgEZY+KpK/B2QFPQMfvm75t8hPAcK1L0BljNSfbhMaMoycQVGc0owq+oetqQ WyTxHVxpPfhiEnw65xMms9rWTlUga4P93OyrYTR0PMKjRR8IOLQGhh3XANevedv0 vIvAdtLhlvuyJxvmbk4T+SZAfbPTqts7dEgvzlT+Gmy01X2J25EyCl4DSge26KJt bWNrCF6qwE18yABkkHndi7k1ofjd19uUDSOepESFrXVxzvfpObi+NLL4MpZ/5UHV DB3aRVEHPCLNDaq2xiPjWJl2HbzR6GkMTxNZfzzMuAWsA73nLExjCtprmMG1o5AR 2pGGDLOY7buOEm3uljkyW8oMQ7CZB5ty20K2ti/pV50ZVgPQOa/7GYp6YT/BRU1S EWLVSulIBKZeY35+tVTSzjWU+KXKmQgU0xIhpqgGRuidAIJsuVLE8cGZAoZzmx/4 6DzjQPCBnPzv1KMb46KH65vTTcW/n3FnL+t26aHTw6s4Q+PDj+s= =S44p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/ACTKESnmfMvUQapsp607gBQ--