From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731B0139694 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:41:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FB6921C08B; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5E3821C039 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [100.42.103.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: williamh) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF0BE34106E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 23:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:41:26 -0600 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] call for agenda items, council meeting Mar 12 Message-ID: <20170227234126.GA22564@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org References: <20170227160544.GA23003@whubbs1.gaikai.biz> <22708.23857.361443.820405@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <22708.27917.807803.995420@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <22708.27917.807803.995420@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Archives-Salt: 22b45647-1c7e-4187-9f16-30972defef02 X-Archives-Hash: 14490faaf9677d1e4d701c602bcfe99f --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 07:16:45PM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Right, there are many paths to insanity there. That's why we should get > rid of the whole thing altogether. =20 I am strongly with ulm on this, we should get rid of $Id$ expansion altogether, especially since there is a way to generate the hashes that $Id$ would create from the command line. If folks want to use the hashes in a work flow some how they can, but they definitely do not belong in the ebuilds. William --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAli0uSAACgkQblQW9DDEZThYlQCbBkdi23BbvWM3zzLusyuzLdTA 9+MAn1Zdaj2RVqR4dHohUx+of2A8+oba =YsZM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO--