From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701BC13888F for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4892921C019; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BF4B21C012 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx6 with SMTP id fx6so173982531wic.1 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=Mc5z5rStp6Gkwdo2i9UPFqDUijMNln8LvFR2r/86OYs=; b=K6qur7w9tgei4VSxubslQDN3AT+GT6vTKNzuGwlRnhzo2q956V0EFfIJlvfb1ZfLa7 zBya50SN6THPQQmXVAKS2iHli/uOKUaW+wx3Jt0Fcnn0hDQ5f59JSy3DnKdtVUsGDhl4 AIiucgAegB4X3E6PCNIXCw+EqfMn6SBCQoR+K0N2zGp/McclaZyeW46Z1u+fV8TJhVRs bS5kd82sCpGjEQyqL+N6q2QOCPby+aOJIoGfnSFFOM+1RmIHR0DvOKtE86IfqKZrQ7Vp Wj5Z/iCDg4TM8soYO9Nnk7E5H/ddl7qJgOYCrUbtT/8XaIcK5ugCQzBUnE4YRxzU9Wj4 hbOQ== X-Received: by 10.180.86.66 with SMTP id n2mr22518536wiz.68.1445973778306; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:22:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc67371-broo7-2-0-cust693.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [82.28.182.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lr6sm18852429wic.3.2015.10.27.12.22.57 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 27 Oct 2015 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:22:47 +0000 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-11-08 Message-ID: <20151027192247.5cd9a212@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <562FCC69.5030308@gentoo.org> References: <562D4269.1030508@gentoo.org> <22061.21589.937200.862099@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <562DDA74.7030800@gentoo.org> <562FCC69.5030308@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.26; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/7WrJpZxRqghvmDR6CDqVLx5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9d937970-5b4c-45cf-9c07-b30961802583 X-Archives-Hash: ff02668cdfcabe9ef8c73e9c5584f88b --Sig_/7WrJpZxRqghvmDR6CDqVLx5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:11:37 +0100 hasufell wrote: > It's still not clear to me how this is supposed to work at all. Are we > expected to run eautoreconf unconditionally just in case a user will > throw in a patch that alters the build system?=20 No, you can opt to run it only if user patches were applied. > I definitely won't do that, because autoreconf is the source for a > lot of problems and build failures. Well perhaps you should fix them, rather than hoping the problems won't be noticed. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/7WrJpZxRqghvmDR6CDqVLx5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlYvzwcACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGodwCffnT04zkt65rwJV5ZnGSMADof i2IAn1YUWUL4/vv9saPjPY5WhCl7IrAV =S9Vv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7WrJpZxRqghvmDR6CDqVLx5--