From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C49713888F for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A715021C010; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5BC921C00D for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:39:30 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X/Le5mi0zzO+f99VO8tQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (88-133-183-17.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [88.133.183.17]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id f02eb6r99NdT7bk (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:39:29 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:40:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.12; x86_64; ; ) References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <5617AB77.4050302@gentoo.org> <5617AFD3.2040503@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <5617AFD3.2040503@gentoo.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201510100140.57846.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 49dc2b41-30e6-40d8-b294-9fe8aa114954 X-Archives-Hash: e314776c7f330e3a3c32b6098479164b -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Freitag, 9. Oktober 2015, 14:15:15 schrieb hasufell: > On 10/09/2015 01:56 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > Well let's think about this. If github went away, or we needed to part > > ways with github, what we would we want to keep from their site? > > It is more likely that our infra servers go down or break than github. > From a reliability standpoint, our infra servers clearly lose. > I think you're missing the point here completely. Whatever. - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGFCGAAoJEB9VdM6hupKVNSMP/304fACDUUZHUBf2ayMXzsU/ P5TJ4y/ev3iW6Xa1DxAf//RKCqtKa5CnfmFLxayDalRKc8YrnhDcVvS6O1XcgpAT 5ZPS6Pp+JsUDfnfvazmaP2CtIAQv8VtrP6k+5b7OzSCvoTrL1CRwTX7ViY2wlDoP N3eAQ6k8wWI2nozP/DUBDXe6d2poXO7XQU7QOVI2TMBakGtb1E/1Fb10Nhzykm0O 9l+7SS1iDPS1B7iZe6zQFer52zU3WBBva+uaPmgouqhXrxw3NGeblQFFx+unqVT2 UIEBBbMA+7GBKfo8IPL69ZES7AiiUJWARkn9N6q9iJO0v8vP6QxF6CcU7elKrnM2 dUwDzOxXTWuuJTBlmZzz0S2WkW75YNb//CCgVlb90PqUxnku5oGMI3EDpcxuSvM9 VoMtwXufSrHwhgymlcnQNOuEXObfSDhuVERPXAtCG2wfC+VimOEsvWzsZzSLUbVY rrz0tht7gH7TLSuC99DdThzbLVFbL9wF2DOLSXAnGcir9IlFgEdJhQ2QauUGuys3 Lp+cITJKosLrcuEyGNjnV6eN/MwpW3VzpN+wVyX/AKx8Keh47wcN76azGSxVmo0d lTD3d6E0/mMxlNLstTPmIFrI8leyHVcopFh6zSkviV2XOaNmm7eHV4k+kTe1i7lX EP0xBjL/h4QhF1Naz/FA =rqeu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----