From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6497E13888F for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C086F21C00C; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:37:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15DA021C001 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 23:37:20 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X/Le5mi0zzO+f99VO8tQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (88-133-183-17.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [88.133.183.17]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.14 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id Y02193r99NbI6qa (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:37:18 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 01:38:43 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.12; x86_64; ; ) References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <5616855D.8000106@gentoo.org> <20151008203032.4d3fe6aa.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20151008203032.4d3fe6aa.mgorny@gentoo.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201510100138.47036.dilfridge@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: acca82e8-37b8-4663-b818-076891300b57 X-Archives-Hash: 45e9705496874e556e12902a5104a376 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Am Donnerstag, 8. Oktober 2015, 20:30:32 schrieb Michał Górny: > Dnia 2015-10-08, o godz. 11:01:49 > > "Anthony G. Basile" napisał(a): > > So perhaps it was unwise for us to get into a situation where either 1) > > we violate the Social Contract or 2) we have to surmount a technically > > difficult situation. > > > > Perhaps those responsible for doing so should fix this. > > Thank all of your for your continuous support. I will not be deploying > any scripts to improve integration in any way. Oh please. A number of fitting replies to this comes into my mind, however sadly none of them would really be in line with our code of conduct. Why does it always have to be "my way or the highway"? If you do participate in a bigger project you will have to compromise at some point. - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWGFAEAAoJEB9VdM6hupKVb+8QAJ7K8VOv4aA/6pGHk98FUltz acQRkZm7pdFofvh2mEVIcRfFojqDwECTmoXASLHCxnxK5mEEIQzMIruPpDsmMJmF c2TJHrIrY0WSU8sUmGum0hlfSvTuPjCJT9pBOkOMdcr/cBePbRU0Pw0jB1vQbTbs IUsmDCfuYEOWfdJ2IE0OBcgSE1toHYNM/xBhXfnHRuDWkgBtxs8zB0bTE6zBX5PD meocksJBsxJUq+ntXYXuLG1ZR3W4C2nnXJdue39ZgL1fBHh2LlBPadx/wuvYOEhp 9q5X7uXrrfh2mPGrCQVDN6G/Gc+RRqsOlEW56Z/Z8gnN1JHH5QUJz8mAJbm6hgTF pP2vLMxUqIXulMazDg773qM5/SVPPkUihPgvFMuo0O+FZyux0cWMHDPduauy7Am3 ECrdE00r3HvizeL0fVQg0uh13SY4b3GbjOos3stjzgnlXVbex+xs5KYBo7IGTQFt djV/ccvuDcloYW+WL2NCtQhpVOL+MdlcDcTsnTnLMo9hyoNBpOiUgQ26DWlHQAxo qH267XqU5AiIO4OHu0UfZgtV7c0yXx8Hlw4pvL6dNs29YvL5UP6w3acksxFkQVd0 z1Y/3wkthj+mSjYxuA2CxIDpNkWdNRT78rqjkEvMBMz5QiwDF/Osv7UdgH7GlCXk ZwufwL6uwobLApS2DZ7z =rMcy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----