Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11

["Michał Górny" <mgorny@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1464 bytes --]

Dnia 2015-10-04, o godz. 08:17:22
Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > Since apparently any tiny change requires Council approval these days,
> > here's another one...
> 
> Trust me, we're as unhappy about this as anybody.
> 
> >
> > Can I change the 'games' component of Bugzilla to assign bugs to
> > bug-wranglers@ rather than games@? Otherwise, newly reported game bugs
> > get assigned directly to games team and often are not reassigned to
> > correct maintainers but instead are left ignored.
> 
> ++ - in light of the decision that anybody can maintain a game apart
> from the games team, it really doesn't make sense to have a bugzilla
> component for games at all.  They should be assigned just like any
> other generic package.

Well, that was my point but other Infra members disagree that we aren't
allowed to change this without full Council approval.

And to be honest, if I were to expand the topic, I'd rather go towards
Bugzilla components on 'Gentoo Linux'. Because right now most of them
don't make any sense, and are confusing to new users who don't know
what to choose. They're pretty much all legacy, and as I see it most of
them should be removed and bugs moved to a single common component.

But that's a topic for another trollfest, I guess.

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 949 bytes --]