From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661E91383E0 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A7ABE21C01C; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC54D21C004 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 21:51:45 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X/Le5mi0zzO+f99VO8tQ== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (88-133-183-17.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [88.133.183.17]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 37.12 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id V06995r91Lpgl3h (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:51:42 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: =?utf-8?q?Micha=C5=82_G=C3=B3rny?= Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-10-11 Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:53:03 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.0.5-gentoo; KDE/4.14.10; x86_64; ; ) Cc: "gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org" , Gentoo Council References: <1904237.nU16iSOlTl@kailua> <201509302236.42443.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20150930223914.4561ac41.mgorny@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20150930223914.4561ac41.mgorny@gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <201510012353.03971.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: ab8bd6d9-6112-4722-9b74-58db1609da6c X-Archives-Hash: ba9ad778fb1948ae76162344f71dc413 Am Mittwoch, 30. September 2015, 22:39:14 schrieb Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny: > > > > > * Obviously there are exceptions to this rigid structure for few > > > > special teams (sec, infra, ...) > > >=20 > > > Doesn't this kill the whole idea? Or are we talking about projects > > > which are not allowed to maintain packages? > >=20 > > What's maintaining packages got to do with the generation the mail > > aliases? >=20 > Well, you just said you want to have team names matching e-mail > addresses. If you add exceptions, that's no longer true. But if they > don't maintain any packages, this won't bite us during bug assignment. I dont think we really need exceptions for the mail adresses. More for the= =20 automatic alias management. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/