From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B5C138B5C for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FE45E08F5; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:09:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA293E08EC for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:09:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-255-11-20.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.11.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 181C634096D; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 11:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 13:09:41 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Rich Freeman Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org, Andrew Savchenko Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2015-04-14: call for agenda items Message-ID: <20150406130941.4b9be79b@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20150402141428.GA31638@oregano.home.lan> <201504032214.01310.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20150404220205.GA415@linux1> <1428237147.22472.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20150405195044.GA2917@linux1> <20150406002706.4aff7e4dda27a25a5c106b50@gentoo.org> <20150406023841.46e7491f7c76925908446de5@gentoo.org> <20150406095922.19036ce2@pomiot.lan> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/SzmhMITpz0Eq.QnzygW2RK7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4d6ac135-e421-42a3-a0a7-cb38fd371359 X-Archives-Hash: 78a3b74c445cce7cedde524961c2acf1 --Sig_/SzmhMITpz0Eq.QnzygW2RK7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2015-04-06, o godz. 06:29:55 Rich Freeman napisa=C5=82(a): > On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > > > > And so far, nobody but me and Patrick basically cared about dependency > > graph not being broken. > > >=20 > Don't assume discussion of alternatives is equivalent to not caring. > The reasons for not breaking the depgraph were fairly well articulated > - it doesn't really add much to repeat them. >=20 > Personally I'm leaning more towards making the entire arches > non-stable, but I'd still prefer to have a policy that can be applied > across all archs, and it doesn't make sense to make all archs > non-stable. Developing a policy that intentionally makes it impossible to work on Gentoo... --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/SzmhMITpz0Eq.QnzygW2RK7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVIml1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOVlMP/33fSxNSPHoRSXZqk5nGLUtb PqR8l5xmxv7ja0lH+gM2iHOdiw4TwciH1aiEwXGtqcpAGWw7+3MfdMaom9QM5OEY RhlOIxz34uf9Z+iaYYjWxY0H5BEo7OSlRlSI+j7HXqT4vUYFrBH9G9NCHTq/YnQb NIxw6hYbhP25nwx74GISwNyOTC0nT0HINskaC0+9A3Aipc/sXmBMJVRj0ILjp8Gz bJ6scUAU4NE++2EgF9uMtFUcfpEhY/9LsRIE94L+hp/tDdSr4QLjpYo7nAHboZKE aMkKXkEont3cgFn+eTMz0YwA1Pox385GWrPEcqZYL0zxzqTEH5xvMFcn7AHUBTZc BPyUs3A5IIP/WLbnRKwLffFL7r2zNqoqDdQm/SzmgNWiL5DmJf6FkUxA7faAjQZD dQPSPVLxTSgVxFALT/wYQYVqlezCcTjfqwt2ekNcwRIiWqHb6niQbgo7VMCeZo5/ LdOoCeH1uO79p7h7B5xhfWqhXoqJnWgHQuH68nhHGxVV4cXYw9GZLdY1QVpvYagG AcCRUZ4XIei3HMhM2uHeTYnUkQM2rVlfejfWB0NKrthObN+YHlIyOkqGzdGt6sKc XtUjxaAbSUulP/c0zp0Z1blzFbs15cLCpTU4fq9KdAchszOEUyUAYgCpMwdO7EDu 8yyaNBjaAyDpfM1tZ74U =Wn/S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/SzmhMITpz0Eq.QnzygW2RK7--