Dnia 2015-04-06, o godz. 06:29:55
Rich Freeman <rich0@gentoo.org> napisał(a):

> On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 3:59 AM, Michał Górny <mgorny@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> > And so far, nobody but me and Patrick basically cared about dependency
> > graph not being broken.
> >
> 
> Don't assume discussion of alternatives is equivalent to not caring.
> The reasons for not breaking the depgraph were fairly well articulated
> - it doesn't really add much to repeat them.
> 
> Personally I'm leaning more towards making the entire arches
> non-stable, but I'd still prefer to have a policy that can be applied
> across all archs, and it doesn't make sense to make all archs
> non-stable.

Developing a policy that intentionally makes it impossible to work
on Gentoo...

-- 
Best regards,
Michał Górny