From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0A8138A1C for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 08:05:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DDBF2E0982; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BA3E0942 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 08:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (ip-5-172-247-243.free.aero2.net.pl [5.172.247.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5875334094F; Mon, 6 Apr 2015 08:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 09:55:25 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: Rich Freeman Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Council meeting 2015-04-14: call for agenda items Message-ID: <20150406095533.762c3a9f@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: References: <20150402141428.GA31638@oregano.home.lan> <201504032214.01310.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20150404220205.GA415@linux1> <1428237147.22472.1.camel@gentoo.org> <20150405195044.GA2917@linux1> <20150406002706.4aff7e4dda27a25a5c106b50@gentoo.org> <5521BF9C.5060809@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/dv9uezAuXXqBZst_YHTLket"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d67492a3-be8a-4f30-a287-a57e978a4723 X-Archives-Hash: 5c28050ac5875c02456ece737596775c --Sig_/dv9uezAuXXqBZst_YHTLket Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2015-04-05, o godz. 20:47:51 Rich Freeman napisa=C5=82(a): > On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 7:05 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > > How git is relevant I don't really see, you'd still have to re-test all > > involved packages, so the effort is mostly in testing and not in running > > ekeyword in a loop. > > >=20 > If you removed stable keywords from 300 packages, they would be in a > single git commit. That means you can restore those keywords in a > single command once you've checked that the new library can be made > stable. The benefit of git is that tree-wide operations are atomic. Which is a moot point since once user gets hit by 300 packages suddenly going ~arch, he has no point in using stable anymore. --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/dv9uezAuXXqBZst_YHTLket Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVIjv6XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOCtMQAMqNdHbhTMaZeR5JjihmgE3y UBqjjUikvBf4P4a2HJRABcu++lPNpAAB+EmjhIJU7MD82KmluL2D38vqDjnJdtEW 7wIckuEIY1QtWH7f6orWlgmsmtJ6tgprk49BY4zQvwI8vcJteb3n61fsy16fRlTY s8N15dEWbFqdz/Gc5HN1yO9SUq+dOvzYFyBAQqCY1yfNdV8VBUGvNMnTaYCEJGa2 Sm1NG3hQjWm1GLSX+2jnnGVf5TRDnzf4Hrp1/qboDxb/9ZgXKp3TaT0zZHlbYm9c TbfzHvJ9qfPIjn0WkSegrNFUy0G/q6Y7b6wWAQhG1G+YlLZjzdhfXEfp/OzMFFsr 2Fci9lisxOXwEe6cUt7QXS53na+v3+VMjwD/u50r9+z74ZrIgXun3HIoVFflX2ka eM0GAo01TrBkEiv4sTx3JDJjutJnW7aFxOWeF1ByYny3GEueN55CSvoiIcVV6pKI z0mLDyAwgr1/fjSUw/XA6tjBqkDzYJ/ZfO2tiVakCwod2GHfdxxaBybCCElVbfhG u5A7EDCUGM+GHE0QDWryKLc+YnVnicPuZla7WlcS5LK+rF6H9/0ZToK9//naWZVl ro1e0QK0WsMGi5F61lACPQFexBkCgOe/it+qHH7b8I3fjV+Hunh/16x27FZoDpod XhxMeylzzfQrxPiz0EcJ =CRNw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/dv9uezAuXXqBZst_YHTLket--