From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2407138A1A for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08CCAE0888; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:19:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7563FE0833 for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:18:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (sloan0.ut.mephi.ru [85.143.112.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bircoph) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B453D34076B for ; Tue, 17 Feb 2015 14:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:18:40 +0300 From: Andrew Savchenko To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo, GitHub, and the Social Contract Message-Id: <20150217171840.284a8b8f640d8afd87c73e72@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: References: <201502142148.30540.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20150215070454.12e20dda@pomiot.lan> <54E0C6B2.1080004@gentoo.org> <20150215174248.29a9621b@googlemail.com> <54E0E7D4.9090905@gentoo.org> <20150215190855.24ba8e86@googlemail.com> <54E1F400.8020103@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA512"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__17_Feb_2015_17_18_41_+0300_Pu.skZh4397nOf_d" X-Archives-Salt: 01c8d0fc-db25-4fa9-8c9d-139d26029b56 X-Archives-Hash: bfc7cdd8b93abcaaa5ec6e0cd0b2849e --Signature=_Tue__17_Feb_2015_17_18_41_+0300_Pu.skZh4397nOf_d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 17 Feb 2015 06:52:24 +0000 (UTC) Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: > On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Michael Jones wrote: >=20 > > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Anthony G. Basile > > wrote: > > > >> Its fine as long as infra is the centre of our operations. Because gi= thub > >> is so much better than cvs provided by infra (sorry infra its true) I = worry > >> that we'll depend on it too much. To be honest, I love the entire git= hub > >> workflow and would feel much better if we could just own it ourselves. > >> > > > > In case folks on this list haven't seen it before, Gerrit[1] offers a > > workflow that might be attractive to Gentoo, over and above GitHub's. >=20 > A few people have mentioned gerrit over time and the infra team is aware= =20 > of it. Unfortunately, gerrit requires Java[1]. Try gogs, its very fast, relatively lightweigth and requires only Go :) http://gogs.io/ Best regards, Andrew Savchenko --Signature=_Tue__17_Feb_2015_17_18_41_+0300_Pu.skZh4397nOf_d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU403MAAoJEPZTWjO6HuSNH2sP/jv6AZH42h43j/lr9XtuDGe6 ic8xL12wwX1UJJHjVuBcQqVUhWvTptLa5wMTz76a5jHnuVUMPi1Ni0H+O0tfw45u vZhpiaXThpGfRjpG6HCPD86lYTvuqexbiADr5bsQAqWAHZGcKuJPziiIX5Em3p9w PhGfdjmdGUmSg4RE7lEL9bvkEPT1tPVFfnMTvYO/x0TLghy8ZUFG+9Y40KB3nFVK VeQoPBnWV1Gf9jwJ24e+wcC+bs7Ws7U/C4BdC1O6a82Nq+ydItLnTaYXs7aVWbOr aMqO6n6ZQ4IyIcKNRYZisWfQOeDeCJn6f5AloqBKyNaYBF/CP9zMQVhMoGVd0Ywf 9klcbdtNbO96Hhmr1IuMvexMrXfmlK3Jq+YTMwF6MQp1Ts6Tx+qamR1LLcMTd3xu i9xRDPD9cQHuITbDCYmIvODseDMKDyZF93Bt+IyyQK02AvV/OpSP+34C2VWz6h11 ZD8oJJqftC2F1M7yAoL+E8sXCd69iX9lnVMK1RXjveg4WrNbxKVvKxLE/Z0NPx/L wPs2fybsSgZr6uwqLePsKXlQVKVjKt4m9DlB5kOvp9tLN0eRobdXTl/17ocOh/GR V5s8/ThP3ga/5DhrgmP/PDx6q17TN6ckJ64NwVJZ+5IqNwPtqI5P4pCStNBKD2/Z lpVgRzwaUDi0g/8pg1Dm =V0ke -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__17_Feb_2015_17_18_41_+0300_Pu.skZh4397nOf_d--