From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RKp6G-0002OD-SP for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A17CF21C075; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E869B21C05E for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 10:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de [134.93.134.92]) by a1iwww1.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id p9VARv2m000678 for ; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:57 +0100 Received: from a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p9VARvMC000796; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:57 +0100 Received: (from ulm@localhost) by a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p9VARvn8000795; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:57 +0100 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Message-ID: <20142.30765.50483.870591@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:27:57 +0100 To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08 In-Reply-To: <4EAE6FD8.5030203@gentoo.org> References: <20111026163025.GA843@gentoo.org> <4EAE6FD8.5030203@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.1 under 23.3.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) From: Ulrich Mueller Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: ecf86054-9a16-4be4-a207-561235f50132 X-Archives-Hash: e7f7afadd60fb49e43eb59b51058d851 >>>>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Petteri R=E4ty wrote: > Let's vote on if you are allowed to remove functions from eclasses (or > break the API in general): > http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_f797a983b0d11677a1f781e48ab4e= 97d.xml > Last time this came up a decision wasn't reached: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20100726-summary.txt > The decision should then be documented here: > http://devmanual.gentoo.org/eclass-writing/index.html Why do we need a decision here? Isn't it simply a special case of the "adding and updating eclasses" policy? Ulrich