From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644713877A for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4D46E0BA5; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 113EFE0BA4 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-255-12-207.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.12.207]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00B7633BE35; Sat, 30 Aug 2014 16:07:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 18:07:17 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-09-09 Message-ID: <20140830180717.06a66117@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <21505.51605.567727.858150@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <21500.62389.550418.564508@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <21505.51605.567727.858150@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/z46_gu+Tg_ZC5bZEfK08jjU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 6167a47a-87c6-4129-ac07-470861e72715 X-Archives-Hash: 0b2f088e164e1cdecb89bc84eb4eaf9c --Sig_/z46_gu+Tg_ZC5bZEfK08jjU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:54:45 Ulrich Mueller napisa=B3(a): > I've got an item for the agenda myself: >=20 > mgorny started a thread about the future of dohtml on gentoo-dev [1]. > Nobody has spoken up in favour of keeping the function. >=20 > So, I am asking the council to discuss and vote on the following > questions: > - Should dohtml be banned from the package manager? > - If yes, what would be the time frame? We could ban it in EAPI 6 > already. Alternatively, we could deprecate it now and ban it in some > later EAPI. > - Do we need a substitute in an eclass? (Note that dohtml in Portage > is written in Python, so it would have to be rewritten from > scratch.) > - If the answer to the first question is no: Should einstalldirs in > EAPI 6 use dodoc -r for HTML_DOCS, instead of dohtml? We should also decide how to prepare developers for the change. I think we could enable warnings for skipped files in earlier EAPIs -- if EAPI 6 will not provide any direct replacement for dohtml, developers may already start replacing it with dodoc. --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/z46_gu+Tg_ZC5bZEfK08jjU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUAfa1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOvZ4P/04/i/8gEMQqXlThuTMZ1cLY ppoOGqDCYZZ5NzqhtteT4Tkegx2QD7jMwDv4ZK8h3mJ4QKA5tttiUqiAhFH2ViCS cO2WMjPHHVH8WHmt7Y7jZgN6l5MI0AeawyLnf0x+Kv9RjXHSUJ8B1cT2h2GQn3cD OGGCiya89roKllhTsTCI+JfpXAvQPQWT+OwKsS64SSp+RvVHAdiP0HpLh+1lHJSX wg4OuppZlSHIIH0hVYUlawI5/cWUgCaKFQFTcwsoaBFB+9lgW4adenyaKd51fzzk TyYusKj5a4Pi276QRhhE2wcyLhYzCSHjV+KkOFNBqgCFMQFLBpSlPTU9KvOMwBXc RBnnQBS5zTjRXD1zQ7kYQeIHoS0IWXGhXdqZIQJW0BoLiUsYXkJ6sC0k9u3O33dY BL3XV6zdlwgCKBtzkI8rjy5LQGZe9wtKFObDQ2WdwCr8jA8ocjGJCRMvqcfuSeLC yfTG+vKdL1yvCMVS922cYkDUj3eSLgUxfp8szcwpIkHCstbpJIPSZmbrpeuIZxNF YHDq3SCe7LfSrcDXfGkC5173daiwO0LKo1J/sWyOLftnJAiRtLuQgsuCKOUGLWb5 ZJ+pLuSZ6otJafFhuiQ3EMjczNcABnwflLX0ETskw62zgsQQ2JrTrFeT6R7F2a/O xaey4k2g+NUEnWElDNkJ =fzHN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/z46_gu+Tg_ZC5bZEfK08jjU--