Dnia 2014-08-30, o godz. 14:54:45 Ulrich Mueller napisał(a): > I've got an item for the agenda myself: > > mgorny started a thread about the future of dohtml on gentoo-dev [1]. > Nobody has spoken up in favour of keeping the function. > > So, I am asking the council to discuss and vote on the following > questions: > - Should dohtml be banned from the package manager? > - If yes, what would be the time frame? We could ban it in EAPI 6 > already. Alternatively, we could deprecate it now and ban it in some > later EAPI. > - Do we need a substitute in an eclass? (Note that dohtml in Portage > is written in Python, so it would have to be rewritten from > scratch.) > - If the answer to the first question is no: Should einstalldirs in > EAPI 6 use dodoc -r for HTML_DOCS, instead of dohtml? We should also decide how to prepare developers for the change. I think we could enable warnings for skipped files in earlier EAPIs -- if EAPI 6 will not provide any direct replacement for dohtml, developers may already start replacing it with dodoc. -- Best regards, Michał Górny