Dnia 2014-08-01, o godz. 05:31:40 Rich Freeman napisał(a): > On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Dnia 2014-07-31, o godz. 22:17:59 > > Rich Freeman napisał(a): > > > >> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> > > >> > Yes, exactly. We need to get dynamic-deps right if they are ever > >> > supposed to become the default. That's one of the reasons that we want > >> > to revert the problematic changes and make Portage use the default > >> > model once again. > >> > >> Do we actually have some kind of list of issues with dynamic deps? > >> The only specific one that I think I've seen is with prerm and subslot > >> deps, but as was pointed out that issue actually is as much of a > >> problem with static deps unless you unmerge all the reverse-deps > >> before upgrading anything, followed by a re-merge. > > > > I already listed the major issues in my second reply to Michael. And I > > forgot about prerm() again, thanks for adding it :). > > Any chance of a link? I'm honestly not finding this list in my list > history, and a search on gmane for kensington with your from address > only comes up with one email in the last few weeks - the one I replied > to. > > Is it possible you're referring to a private email, or some list not on gmane? We're sorry about it, it seems that neither of us have noticed that the mails started going off the list. They have been re-sent now. -- Best regards, Michał Górny