From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5114F13877A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9711BE08F7; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A9C1E0876 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (87-205-65-151.adsl.inetia.pl [87.205.65.151]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5B5B340185; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 19:22:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 21:22:16 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: Pacho Ramos Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 Message-ID: <20140729212216.7e3b641a@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <1406635578.23440.3.camel@gentoo.org> References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <1406635578.23440.3.camel@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/YWUYuOM0.8u/hEJu0wIpkLf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 77a646cf-7dcc-46f0-b9c9-660f7e68fb92 X-Archives-Hash: 99e621d897fcd8bda0be7678541e3943 --Sig_/YWUYuOM0.8u/hEJu0wIpkLf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-07-29, o godz. 14:06:18 Pacho Ramos napisa=B3(a): > Would like to ask for action about how to finally handle bash-completion > on Gentoo. Looks like we are using a different approach as upstream to > handle completions now, there was a try (one year ago) to try to switch > to upstream style but seems that the revision implementing that was > later dropped due some arguments. Just to be clear, the arguments were not due to new bash-completion itself but due to lack of completeness and documentation. If I recall correctly, it was reverted simply because nobody was willing to do the remaining work and we had no real documentation for the new system. In other words, users upgraded, completions stopped working and didn't know why or how to proceed. I don't know if the Council needs to say anything here. It's just a matter of doing the work. --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/YWUYuOM0.8u/hEJu0wIpkLf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJT1/RoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOh9cP/RmuNtTzO6JJgi7l1Thvp2+V nqUYy2RQKXmaG5+uJ9fMpoim8pbOhN8zxWYgM+t43k6m5Bg7i3/z2j6W/QN73UZJ BKnj6lwzCRtMJ2cK4IoXWM0u7zlDPE8X9tuXlSc6V6BEJ3QT/FrYMpNh/EpOsnf8 tCdCQ9/nRZhaH0EsKrWCkZyByb3beLtq848DiXpyuCSCEgamyVXbSvlAoLweLRM+ FstXneWvyf4+WyxD0x6rgorzT4vQ4cWSysUsV14xiL1ajzkPOTQEMWrH27GY2rxG Z/JA6hHhRFZBTFyBXdjf0IjasBYGako4Cw9iK+Rrxa06+mbPwwx8d+lhAyH6mio0 o7qW9NRSPlut09SUuRTdR6kEfUDtYcGParIeJUO/R80X6Y/2bqQhKp6YPVu/xW9+ BkDlfBUujs8wYAU+ks53V/Yc3XpzRszrL1zcqeq6sybL/Cfpy53y/8fM4cALItya b26NAcDPozz5EGlSWTZvOJgzRZ5LNVfBMDftxyrZDeKj4qaU/JpmJ1Br9yVNZLEm aVSedQFciZAGOF2G3fzs8XFw6UxnInpzu1Ka5Uo+F4Gy5865tASgQ6bJHdXtpwpb 1s1/koRtpM1RyGw/ZeDX8PmU+VxX5GI3shUZEfUsXosbKI0m55isJkO1syZjnc94 TcM77qz+XOx7NxHPgziv =/Nwj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/YWUYuOM0.8u/hEJu0wIpkLf--