From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8739813877A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13A86E0848; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:59:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F830E083C for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [100.42.98.7]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: chutzpah) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 35CE83401AA; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:59:37 -0700 From: Patrick McLean To: Ulrich Mueller Cc: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-08-12 Message-ID: <20140729155937.647551d2@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <21463.26330.847055.224071@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.24; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/F9Fny/JJu/NCg3lvtQ4eyvd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3fc8357e-6a5b-4c5a-8865-9773cb67baef X-Archives-Hash: 561ed4b5e0fa94eb1d4375693614aab1 --Sig_/F9Fny/JJu/NCg3lvtQ4eyvd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:18:18 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > Please respond to this message with agenda items. Do not hesitate to > repeat your agenda item here with a pointer if you previously > suggested one (since the last meeting). I would like the council to discuss/vote on running phase functions from all eclasses by default in a future EAPI (preferably EPAI=3D6), instead of the last inherited one. Here is the bug for reference: https://bugs.gentoo.org/516014 --Sig_/F9Fny/JJu/NCg3lvtQ4eyvd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJT2CdZAAoJEHy/RO9cNQiDnJwP/3DDnNzruySifPoULEMK7SqV qqZDsFfebJ6RAgk0g/qtGNCQGFESx8/rinu/VX3ffD1jMfZlcsUIqxyGahumREoI YgypohdHRMiVH90gm88d44dSVcgZInTISoo3h8W65Qtusegk82qgTgwgfVEGNWOw J+4h7ON11u5AgXWtTzWt1GXx7fds3U13c2cFk1tUDe11R8WBQKS/+eGO9FuyEHV4 VBmXw4BmOTNnXkQXxwMPv97ipwoeELQ1kOZxhtRDgXiX7+cDF8bmPItks0ifQHkV 9M2fe4iplfg03MvCgvkNhAcFo/zyvPfRJAHqX4h+a5x3ZMxevtp/7k8EXKootadE R66/uybfMdMc/RnamUeqbNvn/JHQEOVO9gUupAwJNI/7HAEunjmc9oIhVb5PCWQY n3zqtgRXfdO59RfQh9+CENZi+yqpUbet+DrPrtzGwJ0xCS7KTJkPG8gZ7+ULTFzp dlenHuAaKctwcG+hUJTP4duSrk/JDJDlCIaQ0sFgGxhvPqg30H+o93NNa4p8W0xF ag42pdOMJWHM2/Cw61WlqhpORvfOhZjJTxBFw0GaQTUmFrJnQzDq49s+puxVk6gO SrTTWe3O8Z9DVCEbrMy0LL/6dPb/Bii4Tj3o7jnbNwH+xgr4lV6F6wCkFaUgYKWW 9Vkjt7BrXEMwEzzQ/XZ9 =O1SD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/F9Fny/JJu/NCg3lvtQ4eyvd--