From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B621387FD for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:26:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 490EFE094B; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:26:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f52.google.com (mail-wg0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A2BE0940 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b13so124695wgh.35 for ; Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:26:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=DgoloHiuYjFPlAowiEKMQAZa7I1J78lO3vOQxXP1Qpg=; b=Mfy2FmUxXG/CvJ9BVqqPENv1YqJWfUOB6lW10ycjilRiWkoqahMfp9ajfygcZWsbHu 7QpQ1vGBjVTK4hXEsJmVWjFLCy32398RAQgLGfC1MfNOoML/wmCZwdxUKt4Q7a3PzDi7 NXGVyGWBtuPVnjqLCYLx+bDKaMAFBMy4tEc/vYdJrVGXmJdeTmBW+dL8Fw8XcdLSyNcZ mp2TZEyyMzQjdl5WZEh/m/TZTD2ucTR4Rk71h8MmevANF0HOmgNu5F+GaFDV3PpxDK59 6hhb+XKvhSBV8zOyhgg2JYrnwA1etbnb9cIuLJkJgxJjsVxHMKUrxN2YtMq/e6LAc+mQ YHtA== X-Received: by 10.180.19.233 with SMTP id i9mr22280972wie.38.1402248373239; Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc2-broo7-2-0-cust637.14-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.11.186.126]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ja9sm6923109wic.8.2014.06.08.10.26.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:26:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2014 18:26:08 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] EAPI6 Features Message-ID: <20140608182608.23e7b9ed@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <201406081922.10193.dilfridge@gentoo.org> References: <201406081922.10193.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/s8o6PHg.Rn.Vc+G53JCUAdG"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 644c0d99-a89c-4165-870b-b1be779df44a X-Archives-Hash: fcfcdbd862f70e04e6aacdf1923af5ba --Sig_/s8o6PHg.Rn.Vc+G53JCUAdG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 8 Jun 2014 19:22:09 +0200 "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote: > Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2014, 15:04:20 schrieb Rich Freeman: > > Most of the proposed EAPI6 features seem ripe for acceptance, but I > > figured I'd comment on a few here in case others want to weigh in. >=20 > We should probably revisit IUSE_RUNTIME.=20 > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_8b664f7fab584b23dbb10d10e3a0a7= e5.xml Has anyone implemented it and tried it out in practice? --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/s8o6PHg.Rn.Vc+G53JCUAdG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlOUnLIACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGSegCdGENeyI6Y8WlolVqjYCl3VEeg xvwAmQHYNDZX3UEb7UcU/60LINKdQTt0 =d/cu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/s8o6PHg.Rn.Vc+G53JCUAdG--