From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A5F1381FA for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C244BE09F8; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35C0AE09F0 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:43:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from big_daddy.dol-sen.ca (S010600222de111ff.vc.shawcable.net [96.49.5.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dolsen) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 19F7633FBA1 for ; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 16:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 09:42:59 -0700 From: Brian Dolbec To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call For Agenda Items - 10 Jun 2014 Message-ID: <20140605094259.18e18cbb.dolsen@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <5390958B.7030204@gentoo.org> References: <201405292103.06299.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <5390958B.7030204@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/2krA7/uLZ5x01C3Gq/tlE6p"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 5688dfc9-7b78-4a70-81c3-ddc5c5fa1b29 X-Archives-Hash: 8caa6b6f321adab2a86ce72ebdfaa061 --Sig_/2krA7/uLZ5x01C3Gq/tlE6p Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 05 Jun 2014 12:06:35 -0400 Richard Yao wrote: > On 05/29/2014 03:03 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > Am Montag, 26. Mai 2014, 14:13:32 schrieb Rich Freeman: > >> The next Gentoo Council meeting will be on 10 Jun 2014, at 19:00 > >> UTC. > >> > >> Please reply to this email with any proposed agenda items. > >> > >=20 > > Let's decide that the maximum number of EAPIs allowed in the > > portage tree at any time must not exceed 7.=20 > >=20 > > 7, since then EAPI=3D6 can still go ahead as planned.=20 > >=20 > > Any new plans afterwards can only proceed if EAPI=3D1 is finally gone=20 > > (achievable), and for more improvements the bar gets a bit higher > > afterwards.=20 > >=20 > > Thanks to Johu for the inspiration. > >=20 >=20 > I think we should define a minimum amount of time before new EAPIs may > be introduced to the portage tree. 2 years seems reasonable. >=20 That likely won't work. Plus I believe it is already set at a minimum of 1 year, with the possibility for exceptions to be approved by council. But if the ideas and patches to implement them are not done, it could be many years before final approval. --=20 Brian Dolbec --Sig_/2krA7/uLZ5x01C3Gq/tlE6p Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTkJ4UXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLITEIAIx3nfFdiC4WJIh2j1thFc9M 5QkUtmhsNxthZCkpiBLx2q8rNJ5xNBj66YQedIXZRMaHwqVepqkEwe77AizMd/F3 dp8Eqb/lOKpsNDocXnOvzOWfUaVF+2nlF639SzuLr4z+t8xRYojWfuS0gD/RuKOD 1A+pMgSP2J3LDrFACxYXq7rMYQeVq+sBrmmGEjEcq86FubKWZ9Jg11TPQCaDWBjk Bli/85OBQ+0pIq8+++5ifug/KNkA68mAnhinyigrchj51Z9B+3SMb4mTuWVbKlM/ a9GS8HWRFxOyVyVrk4mGJW0WjAknKN7pND1zzEjcOvOP7KQPhw56DXMzEOZKFv0= =9r4t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2krA7/uLZ5x01C3Gq/tlE6p--