From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F29CC1381FA for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 15:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00802E0A84; Sat, 10 May 2014 15:22:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from michel.telenet-ops.be (michel.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.88]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407FFE0A82 for ; Sat, 10 May 2014 15:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.55.127]) by michel.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id 0FNj1o0082khLEN06FNj99; Sat, 10 May 2014 17:22:43 +0200 Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 17:22:31 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hasufell@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 Message-ID: <20140510172231.6af2ee15@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <536E2CE8.1070807@gentoo.org> References: <536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org> <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> <536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org> <536D183A.1020405@gentoo.org> <536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org> <20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org> <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org> <536E1FA7.5050704@gentoo.org> <536E2CE8.1070807@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/DSkP2qfk7.RqBIvvrNJtXg7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: b38dc16d-964b-4049-8772-33811d781447 X-Archives-Hash: 9ee8313a83b75df35001cc33a35339ec --Sig_/DSkP2qfk7.RqBIvvrNJtXg7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 10 May 2014 13:43:04 +0000 hasufell wrote: > Exactly, they should rather be the guys who jump in discussions that > affect tree consistency etc. and help with general inquiries. Instead, > they point me to dev-ML and... council. Do you mean when you ask 'What is the opinion of the QA team on this?' but then later just ignore us and take it to the Gentoo Council? (GTK+) Or a 'Does QA feel this should be treated with more "force"? Seems no one is really interested in fixing any of these bugs.' in an attempt to change the 'more or less' community consensus? (Hacked .pc files) Or the 'giant snowflake' where addressing those related would suffice? Can you please reconsider to talk to them / gentoo-dev ML before us? I'm confused as to why you expect a different response from us... > As I said... I have done a lot of inquiries to QA, both regarding the > new and the old team. It hasn't improved, you know? It has become worse, in a good way. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/DSkP2qfk7.RqBIvvrNJtXg7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTbkQ3AAoJEPWZc8roOL/QiAYH/A8kNidGFSm3KXKLMI8etdkV +LNfBsIbrhkJHL5lz9BPKEuO6pDuo9ahYFvZZhbfKPKzmidMXhelfs34l6riaWLH Mwegt0cdc+qJnJg4J2P82De34TBzGrVKmNRdHOkgAMokVG+0TK6m1MHSc7GxCK18 nWMHgmcjxGzYewH0NMIYGSpUMU1KFleFCIqFZ1vVK4tuEWgRlmc2E8UZjs8SE69j i2rUqnyXklomYjdBzJaEK0k+0wml1ake8CcHoTewV2v6uZxaY2tmZ/7oiRvbWv3e GpetTenHI+ZJSyBe4G3qVlWqgvsrKCvdx8TrQc3Ocp/1Irx6TM8z9RFggESyggc= =vvx4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DSkP2qfk7.RqBIvvrNJtXg7--