From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0454D1381FA for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 19:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DD582E0996; Fri, 9 May 2014 19:00:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be (albert.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.90]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3D7E0929 for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 19:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.55.127]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id zv0p1n02S2khLEN06v0pXD; Fri, 09 May 2014 21:00:50 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 21:00:40 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 Message-ID: <20140509210040.61341e23@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org> References: <536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org> <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> <536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org> <536D183A.1020405@gentoo.org> <536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org> <20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org> <536D2231.6030808@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/NG0yXx+bFNey2CtzWqLG43L"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4ef259fb-14e2-4795-8615-2f5f43433623 X-Archives-Hash: 493ca7b40d636bf45ff91344cfb067be --Sig_/NG0yXx+bFNey2CtzWqLG43L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 09 May 2014 21:45:05 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: >=20 > On 09/05/14 21:37, Tom Wijsman wrote: > >> It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of > >> each package to determine it for himself, no global USE=3D"gtk" > >> possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use. > > So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no > > results. > > >=20 > I'm not so sure, it seems QA is picking policies as per what some loud > people on the ML say as opposed to giving overwhelming technical > arguments their proper weight >=20 > I hope I'm wrong You can inspect the meeting logs and/or summaries, it looks technical to me; if we left some{one,thing} out, you're welcome to point that out. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/NG0yXx+bFNey2CtzWqLG43L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTbSXZAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QdEoH/R1ZbEJTbFMnPD0b2A5/D/It rV61Qd+P0Yt41l7//R69+OKqaKUoeHJe5Be1OvjR5qdQVweJWNIXswzepnGcinha MCAhlG18MO7ZUkNEpya1AR0CQyhMcrZTHzTfnSe2OZoiGy20tCf3IU2cXboMB5/y X9qZHuNBvPMaoMLOHbBVduOAT1Tyre7LVqTJ/959mH/nQu57DbO1kjPn665XJ3yz aSTndalIxqIaNWd8cg1R6DTHFra4J0IxmPE05Xg67eqoUqAImNbWZDEICDn+3Ktz +nW4g9B92IMBpve3Ber69/WGTAUUd1ujuOqIGJNLws+885fXROAUXCG2gnfxhF4= =gr8D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/NG0yXx+bFNey2CtzWqLG43L--