From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (unknown [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EA5F1381FA for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:37:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99F4AE09A2; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baptiste.telenet-ops.be (baptiste.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.51]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69BEE099B for ; Fri, 9 May 2014 18:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gentoo.org ([94.226.55.127]) by baptiste.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id zudd1n0022khLEN01uddSu; Fri, 09 May 2014 20:37:37 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 20:37:27 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call For Agenda Items - 13 May 2014 Message-ID: <20140509203727.1d6a3e69@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org> References: <536CE132.1070305@gentoo.org> <20140509172925.29e3f212@gentoo.org> <536D13CF.2000403@gentoo.org> <536D183A.1020405@gentoo.org> <536D1C28.1010504@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/olRH152gqPYVE.+E1PdVDyp"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 3c3300dd-a211-4c38-b619-fac14df653ee X-Archives-Hash: a4623251c3da9efb1df67f55354a31a6 --Sig_/olRH152gqPYVE.+E1PdVDyp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 09 May 2014 21:19:20 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > Of course they [sic. pkgconfig files] should be allowed, [...] +1 > I'm really not happy about some decisions done by QA lately. Take the > USE=3D"gtk2 gtk3" crap for example, how is disallowing > USE=3D"gtk" (=3D means maintainer has carefully selected which toolkit > works best for the package) improving anything? No final decision is taken here so far, we're waiting for the GNOME team to respond on our mail; until then, I think that the status quo holds. > It's counterproductive, means now user needs to read sourcecode of > each package to determine it for himself, no global USE=3D"gtk" > possible anymore, massive pollution of package.use. So, rehashing it in a thread to which it is unrelated yields no results. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/olRH152gqPYVE.+E1PdVDyp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTbSBnAAoJEPWZc8roOL/QSzMH/0USD/yErIa8YXh50zrTTVSM ss60246AtDg8lxo3Bvu4DNMN/7YeLQciiCTtszWLxIN/5Ye00WaMJ+gOjpyAibuQ z8mJIqwbwb28JLYZ3hcXIA/Ma+E/BXR7aMtzU3bEcdmhFi7xfLFA7u5bOGOiIYUv IvEyDZfahHuZ/BI2DDFi1S6Hs0f54HveiyuGoqXaRKzAUp1aa7P/oTt05c46kaZw 3diN4xJI2kQZ8y7qVw/uCWT7WuhERazZVVFZIv1BpTzZ/LovdgitWPE4CcF8Awlh rjWGrPCDfSVBOsocYbD+EA9f3l3i9sDTCETH5x0vE1rrz4mpM8fd5eDRMIc1+SQ= =URc+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/olRH152gqPYVE.+E1PdVDyp--