From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728CF1387FD for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D6672E09E7; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from albert.telenet-ops.be (albert.telenet-ops.be [195.130.137.90]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B32E09E0 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 12:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([94.226.55.127]) by albert.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id n0p31n00E2khLEN060p3Ae; Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:49:03 +0200 Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 14:48:25 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ssuominen@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 Message-ID: <20140407144825.7d6957fa@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <53429203.8090208@gentoo.org> References: <53342A5F.70903@gentoo.org> <1782441.9eOmMZnMZL@localhost> <53425BA4.8010205@gentoo.org> <1818441.m608ytuvnA@localhost> <53429203.8090208@gentoo.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b2e14b45-5d57-48a6-a36d-e0af7a7b44e5 X-Archives-Hash: 73e037f0ba34c82000df0084f76dfaa9 On Mon, 07 Apr 2014 14:54:43 +0300 Samuli Suominen wrote: > You can get me to change mind by writing up a policy that says > dynamic deps can't be relied upon, and getting rest of the QA > team, perhaps council, on board with it. > #gentoo-qa, yesterday: > > 17:50 < floppym> Hmm... documenting when to revbump in relationship to > RDEPEND is not a bad idea. However, I think the rules would > be a little more subtle than "always". We would also need some way of > dealing with eclasses which generate > RDEPEND, and also with revbumping stable ebuilds. Given multiple people request this, this is put on the Meeting Agenda. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Quality_Assurance/Meeting_Agenda > [...] Indeed, no need to go forth-and-back about this; everyone who wishes to do so, can send their opinion to qa@gentoo.org for it to be taken into consideration. State this in the context of the added agenda item and that you do not wish to receive a reply. > [...] Bringing up the previous QA team learns us to do more knowledge codification; on the other hand, we shouldn't do too much of it either. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D