From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22DE1387FD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D530E0801; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50949E0B44 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-69-105.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.69.105]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 32B3F33F67E; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 06:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 08:07:46 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ryao@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-04-08 Message-ID: <20140331080746.25261b9a@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <69FC69C3-7C44-4A9D-975C-0A3B498DAD97@gentoo.org> References: <53342A5F.70903@gentoo.org> <20140330103342.76108bfb@pomiot.lan> <5338229D.6000801@gentoo.org> <20140330174725.44191bc2@pomiot.lan> <5338A348.3010900@gentoo.org> <69FC69C3-7C44-4A9D-975C-0A3B498DAD97@gentoo.org> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/DZK5u+Rvp46tuKck+=GMK7h"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: d8628608-84eb-4bff-8023-f65549387fea X-Archives-Hash: 90eeb6e017d52abb4c651f7a47c6675e --Sig_/DZK5u+Rvp46tuKck+=GMK7h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-03-30, o godz. 23:13:50 Richard Yao napisa=C5=82(a): > Lets just stick with the JEDEC standard's way of doing things that came f= rom IBM. JEDEC itself admits it have failed with the 'standard way': | NOTE 2 The definitions of kilo, giga, and mega based on powers of two | are included only to reflect common usage. IEEE/ASTM SI 10=E2=80=911997 s= tates | "This practice frequently leads to confusion and is deprecated." Further | confusion results from the popular use of a "megabyte" consisting | of 1 024 000 bytes to define the capacity of the familiar "1.44=E2=80=91M= B" | diskette. http://www.jedec.org/standards-documents/dictionary/terms/mega-m-prefix-uni= ts-semiconductor-storage-capacity --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/DZK5u+Rvp46tuKck+=GMK7h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTOQY3XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOjyIP/2dXaSVaf+r7ChWSFEpVYLmT kGN3fTJiT0ypln0JAAIXNrPWCrVKLIWcgoG6Gdc6WClBYtGvUjlwSXcIH8BLX+LI TpHFizs0zsGcL2YkfuO/Xt9hJEYIUNJ5KprfCTjlwafk1o4EyYOkviW8q5pZGPRN vurMWpwY1/MfHbjjRnLYyYoKMzy7m1tw9QfDb+4aPUBGgYKc84u9pirP2ZI/Roax WQMthoe4FzYme9RRMQnz4/PpK0wznH5mySH7mbCesqFDk39aZYfiP1VjDyzqMWEb 4xBTbzs2L9/c5BeausOuokPtuTuhzeGhf64LrlLRVds354TqARMJhdo6J1cVxVrQ /TAxCxcNvcBFfUMcEd6zHoNEVAIP1EwFhIkNwxcqsGONpHumvYjzax8o8T25pwKh lr9pDrRROpmuZYl/Ehz1dZT7htWQg28BS6rqE35bY2g7G3XAJxBgr6Grjzm/EfzK sygNkXWDF/qes16dFlkykflyeqz87zt+zrmWjfhRgOCdkUu6VdsB0IkB5UeHIMsy Eh648SvL6+1yj+KG3npTk/wQI70H/Yz0j5YB0v2FLQQp640cYyKTudZB/Xm6T25l zOu9WoRfF8XMai8qnabsFR4vx06G7kcYoCFwGbwCShl29s8NG9RcSh2CRFLRado6 mTvGiDlU4XIqKXgh4fTs =/kZt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DZK5u+Rvp46tuKck+=GMK7h--