From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCC813873B for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4113FE0B16; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F4DE0B15 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiot.lan (77-254-67-143.adsl.inetia.pl [77.254.67.143]) (using SSLv3 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C0B733FAAB; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 19:44:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 20:43:51 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ulm@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-03-11 Message-ID: <20140303204351.71d86dfc@pomiot.lan> In-Reply-To: <21268.25605.912759.955368@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> References: <530F38CB.4090608@gentoo.org> <21268.25605.912759.955368@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/Y8l59IwJRECwRyZlQnP6KCo"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: f2985c28-8ca7-450a-9ef4-82de36db0bc7 X-Archives-Hash: 0a0fd46fcd44316e59091d04f9d2c220 --Sig_/Y8l59IwJRECwRyZlQnP6KCo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dnia 2014-03-03, o godz. 12:14:13 Ulrich Mueller napisa=C5=82(a): > >>>>> On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Anthony G Basile wrote: >=20 > > I'm putting the call out there for any agenda items for the next > > Council meeting, which will be held on March 11, 2014 at 1900 UTC. > > This is short notice but we got off track because of FOSDEM and > > we're going to try to get back on track. >=20 > In February we have voted to "ban new EAPI 1 and 2 ebuilds". Now I've > seen some commits where ebuilds were changed in place from EAPI 0 to > EAPI 1. >=20 > Can we clarify that the ban includes updating the EAPI in existing > ebuilds? So how we are supposed to handle updating rev-deps to use proper slot? Convert ancient versions to a new EAPI or just drop them completely? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/Y8l59IwJRECwRyZlQnP6KCo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJTFNt7XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2REJCMDdDQzRGMERBRDA2RUEwQUZFNDFC MDdBMUFFQUVGQjQ0NjRFAAoJELB6GurvtEZOtHoP/iMfi2b7d6BOhY7Xl/cLu1pc mS67/NrYwCC+qLUmSlUxEcCGuw8KHTIJYXWj6H2WDIkj+MJhPLXif2QPyYtTdEK/ k1HuIQ/5V3sZfOHk+ejMeRC8IBHTAJKqVMSnqp9MIYktOm8KQ3U3HLn4HzvEvZbi xOJFR9LJtB01tVeF1eSVfZoVIGr5B+773ZdMW05TiL7bso82Q/B+JbRQw7hwgf3O HxFRR7MzGSZLSvoNOWTS8unjWOESXGSCETswG6UyZs5Wk2xWgMOL906qAQIogAa5 54BV9Ez1J1u1jNNiEdCvYLAayfBKVSZjPplqEs5copVi/PO9AMwKHgRhTmG3k8zy 1s4D0Ij3IWdWA4fYskRwqjEhExcwVh27BXWSp0shiusPAVEzLz9grzgbUJEJoo/h +pk0yZDh9AE11EQo8i1HYQ9pN/nkABLisLa0q/t0GhS4TlfC9RnhFgYUUzxUCXoi XaZ6jPVAv9zuuanXq9lWmxDN6cxF9s2IPYrNcBITJbe498limBgUGl2lpQ+wF0up 4Q9H8iapMfP50QUXIK39Qta72ws3KVWfhqxBUVFiOuKywb8ZMO1RCjCw14rA8HS/ kKOR8Ji7AK6MzfeaGJ1uI4gsVBjb4gNNt1Hq54kW0TNCx94/4JysyLxlgtfHcExX 8S9mb51My8jLPzJZu+9x =a9M5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/Y8l59IwJRECwRyZlQnP6KCo--