From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44F3138CE3 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:57:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0F36E0C38; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p05-ob.smtp.rzone.de [81.169.146.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 080C2E0C35 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:57:30 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :I3kQYkG6f/ML/Lb0bAYFCBt+SpICkd7E+UrA1ycmip9RDA+sU5X/JQTnCoGlRL0/lVRtLA== X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from porto.localnet (tmo-102-38.customers.d1-online.com [80.187.102.38]) by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.25 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id a058f8q1AFvPDXK (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 16:57:25 +0100 (CET) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2014-02-25 Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:00:11 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.10.17-gentoo; KDE/4.12.1; x86_64; ; ) References: <201402101545.39578.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <21240.62117.487172.995650@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> In-Reply-To: <21240.62117.487172.995650@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart42186251.EmfHauINmt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201402101700.21591.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 25bec7c4-fade-4853-8923-c361f664070f X-Archives-Hash: abb65e24699c776f20c7f018e7639088 --nextPart42186251.EmfHauINmt Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Montag, 10. Februar 2014, 16:39:17 schrieb Ulrich Mueller: >=20 > Can we discuss/vote about EAPI deprecation please? Looking at the > summary of our 2013-04-09 meeting, we could take the following three > votes: >=20 > - "EAPI 3 is no longer required for the upgrade path of users' systems." > - "EAPI 3 is discouraged. Repoman should warn about this." > - "EAPI 0 is discouraged. Repoman should warn about this." >=20 Let's add two more votes, following inspiration by Patrick: =2D "EAPI 1 is long deprecated and now banned. Repoman should refuse commit= ting=20 an EAPI 1 ebuild." =2D "EAPI 2 is long deprecated and now banned. Repoman should refuse commit= ting=20 an EAPI 2 ebuild." =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer (council, kde) dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart42186251.EmfHauINmt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABCgAGBQJS+PeMAAoJEJS/30SErRQvP6cQAJR+7Te/D5xsoBX81BPQfqK1 KNH0be4Axyv/QkdjQfDgFenjmUDHhpkpUM7E50xmA7UG4M03RhXjfowY3J5qB8Tw ggJaY6pb9nT7ykViAa278EU4aqG6kHbhChITriqS0Wwr8EGot8k5vRWX1m+Lzt/v vovIwsDTLd6ywqUUhaQstHUlFQMFcnjKwHx20zHb93GOqFWKNm6BenFOQCuMadjm YNEHnRoK5Hm7FxL9D+bIMk+fSyuy6lzHTHZGgMM8Ttyw0eLi2POI+p5D5ofruk03 QRn+9Ved6obKtMSdG1ra7uvSqlAHtHwZz+sTmF4PAbnBtr1Tema/6fwGKSleFcGI PHwU7NPMLxtnP7Cdektt277r+rjTjFcPTHwAe3QJtOImboJSV62cvslH3WWI+HC0 uIDZxrD9frY/nkf3L8iBIDbyE11NEd2NkHx4/yOoVgfmoH+yaBjejhmncwp85P96 gOJ+9iPlFzCA7nDQOgLixXwWHpDEGaP+weRJjL0Z3T8v0sHfu6ojxLv6qzRqllIv XguqDFoqd9+Ss0t3BB0NMm7LEZC6G3s+RFELLWt5cWO70xVP2yeyyflIZfcdu2K7 0jArWl5cpj/JdALbVVOSItL0DPtU93LqamwPIxrMKmWsnScf2Ybqfv17W85C+MIW qDqzyLAkFAhPxlzsTMB4 =RYKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart42186251.EmfHauINmt--