From: Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchrist@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Cc: george@gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:00:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131030130038.GA4918@earth.members.linode.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201310292255.04913.dilfridge@gentoo.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1304 bytes --]
On 22:55 Tue 29 Oct , Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> ...
> 1) top level project "Gentoo Programming Resources"
> - title in table is wrong, should be (according to project page) "Gentoo
> Resources for Programming Languages", or just "Programming Languages"
> - has subprojects ada, haskell, ruby
> proposed action: move java, lisp, perl, php, python in there as additional
> subprojects
>
that project probably is ancient history now (but only george can tell). The
only benefit I could see in such a project would be only for porting new
languages and/or giving manpower to a herd maintaining some rare flavors (compilers /
interpreters) (but there is a lang-misc herd, dont' know if it's
related to some project though). I can't find a reason atm for
example the lisp project to move as subproject of this and bug 151118[1]
does not convince me. Here[2] someone can find the original discussion
on this.
As for what you wrote about cleanliness and order, I understand what you
mean, but a web/wiki page listing all projects related to programming
languages would serve the same.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151118
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/43072/
--
Panagiotis Christopoulos ( pchrist )
( Gentoo Lisp Project )
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 291 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-30 13:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1701685.NthhqudeZE@kailua>
2013-10-29 21:50 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: Dead projects (was: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-11-12) Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-29 21:55 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization (Was: " Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-29 22:15 ` Ulrich Mueller
2013-10-29 22:48 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-30 6:46 ` [gentoo-project] Metastructure: reorganization Ulrich Mueller
2013-10-30 7:36 ` Rich Freeman
2013-10-30 13:00 ` Panagiotis Christopoulos [this message]
2013-10-30 0:33 ` [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Call for agenda items - pgp key handling Patrick Lauer
2013-10-30 5:35 ` Brian Dolbec
2013-10-30 5:55 ` Rich Freeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131030130038.GA4918@earth.members.linode.com \
--to=pchrist@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
--cc=george@gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox