From: Donnie Berkholz <dberkholz@gentoo.org>
To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct (was: Council meeting: Tuesday 2013-10-08, 19:00 UTC)
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 14:07:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131008190742.GA3909@comet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGfcS_n-3h6u3Hiqf+k03+B7aQbaXqD=QGO_MEhyw7086bjAiQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1121 bytes --]
On 07:35 Tue 01 Oct , Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Tomáš Chvátal <scarabeus@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > We had proctors project which failed up horribly, thats why I put something
> > else that does not have the stigma.
Yeah, good call. Other less hostile options are things like community
action team, community response team, or just the vaguer community
relations.
> Honestly, it seems to me that this failure is almost the entire reason
> that we're re-writing the thing, and I don't really see how the new
> version is any different from the old. I think the previous failure
> was in execution, not in concept (and I don't blame the Proctors
> themselves for that).
I agree. It's in large part because we as a council failed to back them
up sufficiently. As soon as they got any heat, they were on their own.
The policy is fine, what we need is the execution and the high-level
support behind it.
--
Thanks,
Donnie
Donnie Berkholz
Council Member / Sr. Developer, Gentoo Linux <http://dberkholz.com>
Analyst, RedMonk <http://redmonk.com/dberkholz/>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-08 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-30 22:49 [gentoo-project] Council meeting: Tuesday 2013-10-08, 19:00 UTC Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-01 10:45 ` [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct (was: Council meeting: Tuesday 2013-10-08, 19:00 UTC) Ulrich Mueller
2013-10-01 10:51 ` Tomáš Chvátal
2013-10-01 11:35 ` Rich Freeman
2013-10-08 19:07 ` Donnie Berkholz [this message]
2013-10-08 19:14 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-10-01 11:31 ` Rich Freeman
2013-10-01 11:50 ` [gentoo-project] Re: Code of conduct Wulf C. Krueger
2013-10-01 13:12 ` Rich Freeman
2013-10-01 17:27 ` hasufell
2013-10-01 17:34 ` Markos Chandras
2013-10-01 18:22 ` hasufell
2013-10-01 18:29 ` Ciaran McCreesh
2013-10-01 18:37 ` Markos Chandras
2013-10-01 18:35 ` Markos Chandras
2013-10-01 19:21 ` hasufell
2013-10-02 0:19 ` Patrick Lauer
2013-10-01 17:07 ` Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
2013-10-01 17:40 ` Anthony G. Basile
2013-10-01 18:13 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2013-10-01 18:57 ` Ulrich Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131008190742.GA3909@comet \
--to=dberkholz@gentoo.org \
--cc=gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox