From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35111381F3 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 19:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC86FE0B0B; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 19:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ea0-f179.google.com (mail-ea0-f179.google.com [209.85.215.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8F3E0BE9 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 19:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f179.google.com with SMTP id b10so1610524eae.10 for ; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; bh=b1F4tvIDjNAHRD1WQjepX5mWDH+zZLX5NYRMbNBLH0o=; b=Bi4EcHBAMcdaMSEgF4HsNTOFpxz7HuecfJ+FOaFUdRzGGpqqEZKByVt5mlb5tPf9Pm rNpMxwFTSqJ4tUPX7fKbsHkVjDIKlG+8P1rF/MJFZyyO5sjLfrmETid0yOMxy4GmnhEA iCFT/iR84bMYrJoqxBsg3PrWD4AQ8hOpW9SL+SOuBp0Msnj3tFAxeweNcDF28vcq4h4U /KAO/iiNuCDfKl1iSEYiaSEKjS4COxXcpk5kfiVRA6+SJh12VVIKoHgAY57xfdo2em18 O4254qhP8fUieaFwnAHgMIV3tvkVIVLZjmsh+QfkdLeAVfMWI9XJz5f0JKslTjzGAP/s J7QQ== X-Received: by 10.14.9.72 with SMTP id 48mr5747957ees.42.1379272143329; Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (cpc3-broo7-2-0-cust157.14-2.cable.virginmedia.com. [86.30.224.158]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bn13sm35382752eeb.11.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 15 Sep 2013 12:09:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2013 20:08:56 +0100 From: Ciaran McCreesh To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-09-10 Message-ID: <20130915200856.42e8752c@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: References: <21020.30575.805569.383992@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130829152248.GA3432@shimane.bonyari.local> <1377796652.5477.15.camel@localhost> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/j=AXmz3VlxVd3pIJD1XPikq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 9a4671bf-fac8-432c-9970-3cc83507264c X-Archives-Hash: 31a121ace3f80c8984939d74074ad9c1 --Sig_/j=AXmz3VlxVd3pIJD1XPikq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 15 Sep 2013 11:03:28 -0400 Rich Freeman wrote: > So, how about this as a policy: > If a maintainer has an open STABLEREQ, or a KEYWORDREQ blocking a > pending STABLEREQ, for 90 days with archs CCed and otherwise ready to > be stabilized, the maintainer can remove older stable versions of the > package at their discretion. A package is considered ready to be > stabilized if it has been in the tree for 30 days, and has no known > major flaws on arches that upstream considers supported. The danger of this approach is that it encourages arch teams to stable even if they're not convinced something's been tested sufficiently. --=20 Ciaran McCreesh --Sig_/j=AXmz3VlxVd3pIJD1XPikq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlI2BcwACgkQ96zL6DUtXhH2pQCfXMnQjL77bTIfC5ridOvutiQ4 GekAniGMvSYzg7JKaeoWKhgh86UGskKe =/kWf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/j=AXmz3VlxVd3pIJD1XPikq--