From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 074401381F3 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:20:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73ABEE0B6B; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:20:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-f43.google.com (mail-oa0-f43.google.com [209.85.219.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5876E0B56 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i10so3680645oag.2 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:20:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=Ib+1cF3UJK3K3Mztrr0uk+FCxpp22QekHXuhJSG6RDM=; b=LtWYPsJchXIXrM5w+9DsyoC3gRBIdDk6UHHPNdMTnBMRI9jpGrAzXaJomw4v4rtQKp b6WmDY/aCiH2SSowkpKjcfF8V6KdKND5Fc7nrtGLszJndWRiuE1MBXtkaLzCf1j6700q TjM7oSirBSL6N/2n07ASrqdC/M0DvLSK9jQErpghPvbwq5yHQJnaucTmT1JI7CfEftFv CJNpPRM8esHHtlxhCeXemrwi3Qj8qPIRCmP1AtsdBNuAtEuiHmEzA+I3TrIwxvMWMY31 8WSOwE4H4pJy4vbZBohLbss2ErekUphcBGHMCpqxrUTxsfnB/th8pEoKCKCkCFKsBD5D a+0A== X-Received: by 10.182.48.230 with SMTP id p6mr4847248obn.1.1376778028895; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux1 (cpe-76-187-91-128.tx.res.rr.com. [76.187.91.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qi5sm4297046obb.6.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 15:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: William Hubbs Received: by linux1 (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:20:25 -0500 Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:20:25 -0500 From: William Hubbs To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-project] rfc: separate /usr preparation vote Message-ID: <20130817222025.GA15851@linux1> Mail-Followup-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Archives-Salt: 5667e2b3-e1a7-4f96-a568-105d3d55dcdc X-Archives-Hash: b76e1bfa615303ab653cc1e43edadf62 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Council members, After looking over the documentation I know about [1] [2] [3], I think it is safe to Say we are prepared to move forward with stating that the preparations for early boot mechanisms are complete. So, I am asking the council to bring the following statement to a vote in the next meeting: The Council agrees that all preparations for dropping support for separate /usr without an initramfs or similar boot mechanism are complete. If anyone reading this disagrees about the preparations being complete, please file bugs and make them block the tracker [4] before the next meeting. Thanks, William [1] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/initramfs-guide.xml [2] http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-x86+raid+lvm2-quickinstall.xml [3] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Early_Userspace_Mounting [4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481202 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIP9ykACgkQblQW9DDEZTj7PQCglaP+hiZlZ0IgJkBllS7sm+gR kHAAnRAKlnihj2OnMyHqd+PTQUw6EFXq =P757 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--