Re: [gentoo-project] On the way Devrel is constituted

[William Hubbs <williamh@gentoo.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 957 bytes --]

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:07:25PM +0200, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
> These rules sound all ok, but which real problem are they intended to solve?

Don't ask me, I was just going through the thread trying to come up with
something that most people would agree with. As far as I am aware there
isn't a problem with devrel/qa abusing power.

> If not, what indication exists that makes such abuse of power appear likely
> in the future?
 
 I haven't seen one myself.

> If such a thing has never occured, and there is nothing which indicates
> that it is going to occur, then I think we can drop the rule #2 as it
> introduces only unnecessary bureaucracy. If we start seeing actual abuse of
> power then requiring approval of Council for QA/devrel leads or actions can
> be reconsidered.
 
If you drop rule 2 from that list, the way I see it, you are just
stating how we are operating now which is fine with me.

William


[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]