From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476B81381F3 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA5F0E0962; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:07:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jacques.telenet-ops.be (jacques.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.50]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26EFE0952 for ; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:07:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by jacques.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id qK7A1l00b2khLEN0JK7Ai1; Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:07:11 +0200 Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:04:23 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: hwoarang@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Temporary DevRel actions for CoC violations Message-ID: <20130619210423.00797877@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: <20130619184924.GA5722@linux1> References: <51C1EBF5.3080707@gentoo.org> <20130619184924.GA5722@linux1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.18; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/LBsB16ZRfKUny7+A=ZVmE3m"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: bcd7e919-4e6b-498d-8509-f2f32a1fe81d X-Archives-Hash: bba4ebb1dc625af5201fa7017179a67e --Sig_/LBsB16ZRfKUny7+A=ZVmE3m Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:49:24 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:59:03PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Markos Chandras > > wrote: > > > For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on > > > formalizing a new policy, and we will announce news on this soon. > > > In the meantime, to prevent further escalations, I will use my > > > lead powers to request immediate bans whenever I see one of you > > > violate the CoC[2] and ignore the previous warnings. > >=20 > > Perhaps a bit of a sledgehammer approach, but right now I think it > > is safe to say that we're leaning far too on the side of leniency. > > I look forward to the new policy proposals. >=20 > Markos, I want to also publically say thanks for handling this. The > bullying/trolling/etc has been going on for far too long. Yes, it may > be a sledgehammer approach, but there are times when the big > sledgehammer is needed, and imo this is one of those times. +1; for cases that aren't worthy of a sledgehammer, I hope there will be short templated warnings to put the developers back on track. Good to see Developer Relations stepping up; there has been a bit too much noise on the mailing list lately, most of those took a considerable amount of time that could have been invested on more useful matters. --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/LBsB16ZRfKUny7+A=ZVmE3m Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRwgC+AAoJEJWyH81tNOV9gKUIALYIj6fVtszF0QZ655TALAfZ cqDzCtd2qdj8y6ZFyw4pfdjFtGCGAKzCSrPR9kq/tT4fPw2+KUrWaNRXTuptrKNF 36nWe96DsBtNW+BhrQho2ZLEtXOH15kMnRmiLqagFl81lBacCkf46Ul+cDUjkXBF dXh6v6G7KbF8kkzh5wqecwOY8T/xqFUCLe0lPkJhTnpOj/1DhXfj+WkCSKsKs+FF xC5D5Chb20aLy666A6P+XMGkvqdsqgq7iyY5T1EUJ7bb0mnWPbbCMnxmaDXMhgW+ FauAdjZ1eiicQ3xKNvK5nlHEcelsgf7wbU9a8plc0y8b0zs4PGsOUIQJ4CcducI= =1hjC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/LBsB16ZRfKUny7+A=ZVmE3m--