Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 16:25:35 schrieb Michał Górny: > Dnia 2013-06-12, o godz. 18:16:10 > > Alexander V Vershilov napisał(a): > > On 12 June 2013 17:59, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > Honestly, right now what I'd advocate for systemd unit maintainers is > > > to: 1. File a bug with the maintainer with a patch asking for the > > > unit to be added, and indicating that if there is no response in 7 > > > days it will be commited. > > > 2. If the maintainer doesn't commit it themselves, then commit it for > > > them in 7 days. > > > > It will be good if commiter will add himself/or systemd team to metadata > > with description that unit bugs will be should be assigned to him. As it > > will add a level of responsibility for commiter, as he should realize > > that if current maintainer is > > unable or unwilling to test this part of functionality. > > I don't understand why do we need to treat systemd special here. And that is basically the whole important point. * There is no need to treat systemd specially. * There is however a distinct need to work together. If you are listed as the sole maintainer of your package, that still does not mean you can do about every possible thing with it. You should still be required to cooperate with others in the interest of Gentoo as a whole. We all know the slogan "Gentoo is about choice". So, please, make that choice possible. Cooperate with others. Help enhance the available choices of Gentoo software. -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/