From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297B71381F3 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:05:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D5CFEE0B3F; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de (mo-p05-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101EFE0B34 for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 17:05:10 +0000 (UTC) X-RZG-AUTH: :IW0NeWCpcPchHrcnS4ebzBgQnKHTmUiSF2JlOcyz+57jTVMtVX7771jWiJc= X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo05 Received: from pinacolada.localnet (95-130-165-192.hsi.glasfaser-ostbayern.de [95.130.165.192]) by smtp.strato.de (jorabe mo2) (RZmta 31.27 AUTH) with ESMTPA id Z054c7p4QGX8Uz for ; Sun, 26 May 2013 19:05:03 +0200 (CEST) From: "Andreas K. Huettel" To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Gentoo Code of Conduct Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 19:06:35 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.6.11-gentoo; KDE/4.10.3; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2697029.UMg6qHKL2F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201305261906.41463.dilfridge@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: aa7bcefe-e625-4539-b7ab-641f6665c949 X-Archives-Hash: 155447cd8a9780d9b701d68dd6480eb3 --nextPart2697029.UMg6qHKL2F Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sonntag, 26. Mai 2013, 17:06:07 schrieb Denis Dupeyron: >=20 > Bottom line is, and I'm weighing my words very carefully after years > of seeing all this from the inside: nobody cares enough. >=20 Well... Let's put it like this. Sometime a while ago an oldtimer dev attacked a newbie dev on IRC, basicall= y=20 just because the newbie did his job properly, and this would have resulted = in=20 additional work for the oldtimer.=20 I took the liberty of telling the old guy to stfu and not interfere. Immediately, several others, who had not followed the issue at all, started= =20 directing comments at me, telling me I was wrong. To my immense amusement,= =20 they then gave emphasized statements how things should be done, and that wa= s=20 exactly how the *newbie* did it! Now, I dont care that much anymore. However, I would suggest... If we do=20 update our code of conduct we should make one thing very clear in the code = of=20 conduct or devrel guidelines or whatever: Independent of how many thousands= of=20 commits on g-x86 you did or do,=20 Noone in gentoo is irreplaceable enough to justify gross misbehaviour. =2D-=20 Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo Linux developer=20 dilfridge@gentoo.org http://www.akhuettel.de/ --nextPart2697029.UMg6qHKL2F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJRokEhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQwNzlCRDk4QzA4RENBRkYzQUEwRjQzMDlF QkU2QTMzNkJFMTkwMzlDAAoJEOvmoza+GQOc3KYP/itsz/gGuwHkxI4+EHbIleve 9ArwMS+MrNI6/quuT7P8F9756uDYmiBivX/gA8UB0ZYsb0xsFneklx+BbAWyxWPj irFJDxJHprSf7emfrwhADtW45apQ9Wvr967ZaStuKxNi43mid18e7IOUNhP/KP6L HjQdTjwQq51O3lZ7y5RB0bBTiWil+rJhJDIUQOPmuzwGTx6tPFxLIQq7RDD+iIbL RWrkww/NA/IX4+LFgfUOsN3s9uHvEbsX+Qxv9oa5IkZMM6vn6a4v2MlnH1G8XcfS oarcDQan4IN+IrFw/nXbuzV7R6Yl55gguLxfUO1za77Ay0u2eiI2VrmNEcGq3Ydo o1c2y5yW03h2z8TlxTUzkuE4KW1/p1OaCXUdK78BTvT/CudndUtCtsfiiJlVkKW4 jhgtZ26C9nsMPuOQpjZYnwMOgi+wsTL0cCRqcyibmIzeJHe1YzQrCXl2WLkX/Tz6 GV8eeX3grRRbJL8tLsZz3bLfYbY+4xoasMxp27J5kOgC+qCxsiOehR+lVpP9HKZ7 Dt3mc+oDdZOAGhQ0HfehCUWTehmNOBPDevWGOUyC8a6PAq7wHrrv9RJFF7PAP72I LmeFYYwDxBRV2dPpArICnjylfcsQGMxt7/MkH31ao2Wl981wkF+OaRTI+LnZvgRM LOKKXexgY02VSWSroF6c =lfuO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2697029.UMg6qHKL2F--