From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B0951381F3 for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CE25E08F2; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C56F1E08DF for ; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:28:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (77-255-24-177.adsl.inetia.pl [77.255.24.177]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADC3A33E00F; Wed, 1 May 2013 15:28:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:28:02 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-2?B?TWljaGGzIEfzcm55?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ciaran.mccreesh@googlemail.com Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-05-14 Message-ID: <20130501172802.0f9ef9ec@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <20130501162247.17bc7f11@googlemail.com> References: <517C03E8.7040406@gentoo.org> <5181325A.2030701@gentoo.org> <20130501162247.17bc7f11@googlemail.com> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/MDo0.czJp.rj3Y.begNS=o="; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4745924d-777e-4c5f-a737-c065855cda32 X-Archives-Hash: 893c0d0d8193085ebd83c0655367a5fc --Sig_/MDo0.czJp.rj3Y.begNS=o= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 1 May 2013 16:22:47 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:18:50 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > > I know that this feature has been questioned by some, especially by > > people involved with Paludis (which doesn't implement preserve-libs). > > I think that the main compliant is that preserve-libs doesn't > > preserve any non-library dependencies (such as configuration files) > > that a library may depend on. >=20 > ...and that it's utterly frickin' broken as a concept, and that > adopting it will slow down people switching to the proper solution to > the problem, which is slots. Convince the developers to split packages into proper parts, then we can talk. Or even better, convince upstreams to split their packages. --=20 Best regards, Micha=B3 G=F3rny --Sig_/MDo0.czJp.rj3Y.begNS=o= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRgTSCXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKqQkQALV9jjonUgYHXy2497Do3RmL bGjYjK4yqpeIGCHgoglfUXh6prnManBK+QqqkNd74skgEYffO1t1c9b0f7uM39ix hkHD4zf1GL0BcBFqOk8Z91uPt4lAq2lkzqGoj42d/gG5AbYkl+32gKAqvln+J1iy F8zJWLnhgOn8Oqu6qUv01YN0OcKazWUkXa17linlxUIIxJYEf+UK21eHa5IcDGcL KGTAk38Re8DPqVPetrXC7gBWyBkFuyQeIy7/EQS0J/U1Zu+JzlPWCnyXblMu2qgA 6HvOpG5gDpvbLByIecaF15PSt+VZLULVRFFN375fU1KIUiIicKF6Drf4KB8fPzvh GH43t9HAm6a2BrJbGjV3Qs2RnAzMXkHuQYbZg6HyFGmSfC67k7IefW0LJ+IkcQB4 wJDjoXvJaF0JK26ON3pOaS5uyRiZgoSvW6e/cPsTyfuShEozXzNWceTn2DBKwgaB qOK1RTmC/pfmrcVljcGu5aPMArLKjO+DToB5rVht7Jp1GwhLooq6Hery9jJc3KDT 2Nvn9NhKgDKAvBHVkKn4mNFgMFrUOFNh2GfEEOFTy3tvR2x1n3iSmQSH8gHGb/XE BmvO9e6GV6WeyguiIQLxnlSG5jWzATcH5t5dnt3h6Kb8RXqFBYUJwjypQJSmbwt3 SBKyOppue+jVdg7m76/K =kmjf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/MDo0.czJp.rj3Y.begNS=o=--