From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA261381F3 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:23:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD343E09A6; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01B69E099E for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vapier.localnet (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9151833DC6C for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 19:23:02 +0000 (UTC) From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 15:24:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.8.3; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130408232028.56cdad67@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <20130409075747.24cc17d3@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20130409075747.24cc17d3@pomiocik.lan> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart7164516.p4cUhFGWyS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304091524.11412.vapier@gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: 1048edbb-194a-4a8d-aefc-445f3d727efd X-Archives-Hash: 06f6e2ec977fffd3e6d1d6524a58670f --nextPart7164516.p4cUhFGWyS Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 09 April 2013 01:57:47 Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny wrote: > On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 23:20:28 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > > If someone else wants to try and improve the situation, please feel fre= e. >=20 > Just to be sure -- would you be ok if we tried to inline some > of the eclass code into the ebuilds (future versions/revbumps)? not really. you can still build gcc-2.95 and newer with the current code, = but=20 the amount of "tc_version_is_at_least" is fairly low. from time to time,=20 people also create their own gcc ebuild forks which use this eclass either= =20 because it's a completely different code base, orit has some serious patche= s=20 that we aren't interested in carrying, or people want to experiment. curre= nt=20 examples: kgcc64 msp430 gcc-apple. we've had other embedded works in the=20 past, as well as hardened ones. =2Dmike --nextPart7164516.p4cUhFGWyS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJRZGrbAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WB0NsP/jAHEm2baie4Oja3HWDdj0OZ 2SGEc3eDl/rAZp9DCfct1WR45AnlwInz1Hr2gzXXnTw18eQmjEUHn1J+pctuccdj dyy3V4AkWr3P0syq+5h55S7wNE2Sg/Oy3i+9XiHjobj3MUI0hnAJH09GfO/9Ua67 /rwxa+NaALS6WKXgTx8gJLikJUG7/ve1VW7Zt66jjv145cIlcqrMQD/QHEqahfjW YFxmCC/FRwtIZ+V49X0M2HYviDlBKqiUprSkXpAhlG1RadO9motbPOdVAUe+uMfB pIhYnliFOAuoReMukOyfE9RN4YeLkXukjmO1qcrikNwvifmKVEDpylzlQNhCsdux fKUhKnA6IPFHvMzVpwlR/Pp5btNp2NSBWvkMfletf+DoXqWWw6CqJTffrd71xnJU /zey0EEAPslQzviyN0z4RWnwsZMV/RW+KU2ZCP/7jKPCaWIKEIsC9XQdUvLKbkEs DOmLKoEtKErm+uCeRpvwSmGzbS7abb2BDPzL13bneluLf4SusHbJ9S3CfZLiXU5j +D/XylaqvZP5XKCYl8DVALt0iArZN4t+qSsbtYE/7mWv7QTmlSZMyCFlbvrPBNqr foJ6n0VY/2C1xq3guZKDOqFLbc8vrVTSQK8/2b5tYC+BM38o+EMLFG73DS+JnHO3 g0xvutrDwFmoKx2tlP0B =uADd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7164516.p4cUhFGWyS--