From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558E51381F3 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBB93E0967; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27ED1E0966 for ; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:58:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pomiocik.lan (unknown [81.219.207.41]) (using SSLv3 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: mgorny) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D25C33DC57; Tue, 9 Apr 2013 05:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 07:57:47 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBHw7Nybnk=?= To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Cc: dirtyepic@gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Message-ID: <20130409075747.24cc17d3@pomiocik.lan> In-Reply-To: <20130408232028.56cdad67@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130406200511.01d4c0e9@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <201304071409.03862.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130408232028.56cdad67@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> Organization: Gentoo X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA512; boundary="Sig_/YXcwJM4/1GvnpKQmQWzGgyw"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: 4d1224eb-d04d-414c-b50c-7acb1c10dcfe X-Archives-Hash: b9d9f060030c103e53ed843500e51139 --Sig_/YXcwJM4/1GvnpKQmQWzGgyw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 8 Apr 2013 23:20:28 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > If someone else wants to try and improve the situation, please feel free. Just to be sure -- would you be ok if we tried to inline some of the eclass code into the ebuilds (future versions/revbumps)? --=20 Best regards, Micha=C5=82 G=C3=B3rny --Sig_/YXcwJM4/1GvnpKQmQWzGgyw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJRY63fXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ1RUJGMjBGOTk2RkIzQzIyQ0M2RkNBNDBC QUJGMUQ1RkY4QzgxMTBBAAoJELq/HV/4yBEKovIP/RcKpMLVgXyeRJobGkgVxGGE FpGAUAXIPT6cKL8iStk9QVXHUIkvyTreo5Idf8QnO/oxIaMcp1Iia7xyOrtAH4Uc WlY48Z7VurjVP1WD6jnttTyZ8mm/Wx0Q7ErPg9uzv6XYib7Zhz4EGlaaKDGuca2K euw+Kpkn6lWDhMC807DyrDVtd7dkjnsTP6TWMr143orUGdY6ON2mYY5Iq+vPRV40 MHXATMS2ll0UGuZTNrdRZlMVj2yZ5gxjoEAmUMTWHu62S5hwpytHCDn0c6r9c2Z4 4E5dy+CH4mpdD0ii1sUY1m9iAqohiAtWQToCzLhLmbyFIVuBgw0uEhn2QFv5CsxY iDQrxLegniyV3VK+JWxBrzPrI1C99oKO6wxncg6Ewap4IOCQb9tw04OQSYNzbH4b +RY/ise8xUg50fvZEjbtzoN1fprpAK9QCDuDRK4gWXRotnLG7SrrBGW/4PkMP+00 rUY7HJM2EY6/RgE77Hx9nO3oQ4fXETCfqA6eFuyBBw89XKJmgTI5muKuXZ95zdoM QO/GBZxk71iQrKxUPWl69zpV6i34lXGpHOzjyiLw3ksVD9XBYg3gauA7pvHVUYrP jyVJ5S6x+xjkA/WOfO7kZwyRCxOjnnYMoQhFp2m7PfxlmSK9lr3COd99zS02oteY cilWHyELPJ1lvIqTijNQ =rt8T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/YXcwJM4/1GvnpKQmQWzGgyw--