From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636411381F3 for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32AF7E0D41; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gerard.telenet-ops.be (gerard.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.48]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509FAE0D3B for ; Sun, 7 Apr 2013 14:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from TOMWIJ-GENTOO ([94.226.55.127]) by gerard.telenet-ops.be with bizsmtp id M2QK1l00N2khLEN0H2QKVQ; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 16:24:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 16:23:29 +0200 From: Tom Wijsman To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for agenda items - Council meeting 2013-04-09 Message-ID: <20130407162329.1e685b27@TOMWIJ-GENTOO> In-Reply-To: References: <20817.55135.354752.397336@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20831.474.441795.677277@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de> <20130406154314.0d7dc7ef@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <201304070037.28554.dilfridge@gentoo.org> <20130406200511.01d4c0e9@caribou.gateway.2wire.net> <20130407082718.3e7d961f@googlemail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.17; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Project discussion list X-BeenThere: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Reply-To: gentoo-project@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/fM4GUgunrJtxKB61ak9POJs"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Archives-Salt: bf89239b-6a83-46bb-9ae5-c15a44da4755 X-Archives-Hash: 29435849eea9d48375021767a9d3efdb --Sig_/fM4GUgunrJtxKB61ak9POJs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 7 Apr 2013 11:51:30 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote: > On 7 April 2013 11:41, Ben de Groot wrote: > > Errr so you are just repeating what I said? It works fine as it is, it > breaks with other EAPIs so just leave it as it is. Why should we wait until it becomes utterly broken? Why should it stop improvement of the rest of the environment? Do you really want to keep unmodifiable legacy software that appears to work to you but is broken by design? It is always better to look at a future-proof solution now instead of applying even more hacks in the future... --=20 With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-mail address : TomWij@gentoo.org GPG Public Key : 6D34E57D GPG Fingerprint : C165 AF18 AB4C 400B C3D2 ABF0 95B2 1FCD 6D34 E57D --Sig_/fM4GUgunrJtxKB61ak9POJs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRYYFhAAoJEJWyH81tNOV9xwYIAMbOEsiFYXNtMuiow/QloMec nMENAsmMmdzo2LJsyPKvJ/qvj+aU8Qskxf8zFniQMh2HVeUEXx0DUZT96K8+14VH 0q370kKlgpwGVn34QQBE0COkA0k64bBORTbx6XDwXoyDblzxTH5YZW24xSWEQAEs ApjgtAA1lETbZacnlwHOsoWira9Can8VNILXRU/h8tXmjH5fUErWMu2g6NXNf8MN WiQukNysLkhEsYO/X5Ei/M5gpAyM/pNVBI7cnlIEvklP3yXfJRHmLwauJ83zVkwt kPUoEQxAZXZCpKZBV4xkuGX5+gf4kSwIcdgjPDYKRK1GZGqJNZuoXmQ9/R710S0= =cM6f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/fM4GUgunrJtxKB61ak9POJs--